Rashomon is a situation borrowed from Akira Kurosawa's famous film where truth can be alleged in many variations depending on the perspectives of the respective truth-brokers.
In the latest example, Anwar disclosed yesterday that during his medical examination at the KL Hospital, he was stripped naked, had his whole body examined including his private parts measured.
In today's papers, for example, people from the government, notably the Home Affairs Minister who helped Malaysia lose Batu Puteh, started to make statements that suggest Anwar was not cooperating with the police investigations into the alleged sodomy claim made against him. So, the stage is set.
Now, back to the original question: Was Anwar stripped naked? Did he have his whole body examined including his private parts measured?
Never mind the effect is as good as quoting from an anonymous blog, interestingly, the New Straits Times today found it fit to use an unnamed source to rebut Anwar's version of truth.
Let me excerpt today's NST:
Anwar also spoke of his embarrassment at being ordered to strip naked and "measured" when he was taken to the hospital.
"I was stripped naked and had my private parts examined. They also measured the parts," he said.
He said he refused to have photographs taken "as that could end up on YouTube (the free video streaming website)".
The allegation that he was stripped naked, however, was denied by hospital authorities who also claimed he was not "measured".
A hospital official said all those brought in for rape of sodomy cases were given due respect and examined in a professional manner in keeping with the code of medical conduct.
"At all times, due respect is given to ensure that the patient's decency is not violated," the official told the New Straits Times.
Now, enters the third version. This is from Anwar's lawyer and the MP for Subang, R Sivarasa, and I quote Malaysiakini:
"That statement is false," said R Sivarasa in a press conference today, referring to a New Straits Times report which quoted hospital authorities as denying that Anwar was stripped naked and measured.
And again, Sivarasa was quoted as saying in another Malaysiakini story:
"I’m not sure if it’s entirely within journalistic ethics. You quote an unnamed source, hospital authorities say that this did not happen, and we’re saying that’s a false statement.
"He was stripped naked, he was measured, for the record," he said.
A reprise of the 1998 debacle?
Importantly, Sivarasa also said that the police were not addressing a prime issue pertaining to Anwar's concerns about the possibility of his DNA sample being fabricated and manipulated. The lawyer quoted the 1998 episode:
"In 1998-1999 trials, Anwar experienced the phenomenon of fabrication of DNA evidence. We had SAC Rodwan illegally removing DNA samples from forensic custody. In cross-examination of the prosecution's witnesses it was exposed that DNA taken from blood samples was planted on the infamous mattress," said Sivarasa.
"When confronted with this fact the prosecution amended its charge and persuaded the judge, Augustine Paul, to expunge the entire DNA evidence from the record, preventing Anwar's lawyers from responding."
Which is the real truth, you may ask? Rashomon again.
If you had watched the 1950 Kurosawa film several times, like me, you would have been impressed with the ending scene. The last shot closes on the woodcutter (who wasn't really a saint as he had stolen the dagger that killed the samurai) walking home with the baby. Pan up, and the rain has stopped and the clouds have opened revealing the sun in contrast to the beginning where it was downcast.
And you turned off the DVD, fulfilled that deceptions and lies shake even a priest's faith in humanity. But there's, after all, hope to start things anew for everyone once down-trodden.
The plot thickens. But it's good to read Sivarasa's statement in full to get a firm context. It's not that difficult to single out the lies and liars, this time.
Continue reading "Stripped and measured... Another Rashomon" »