'Kuala clowns'
As far as United Arab Emirates (UAE) is concerned, Malaysia is doomed right from Day One of 2009.
Malaysia doesn't seem to feature well in the eyes of investment advisors, and those of the headline-writers in the newsroom, over there. Really, which Malaysian monkey had spoilt the soup for most of us here?
For the wrong reasons, Malaysia got into the the January 1 edition of 7Days, the first free, tabloid-sized English language newspaper circulating 75,000 copies a day in Dubai and Abu Dhabi published by the Al Sidra Media LLC -- positioned as a sister newspaper to Metro published by Associated Newspapers in the UK which also produces the Daily Mail.
In the Your Money section on Page 16, columnist Graham Wolverson, an Independent Financial Adviser with Joie de Vivre International Insurance Brokerage LLC, advises his readers to avoid any inducement of investing in Malaysia. His article is titled: Don't believe those Kuala clowns.
A picture of the Petronas Twin Towers accompanies the story, captioned: LOOKS GOOD: But Kuala Lumpur is a hotbed for dodgy schemes.

Apparently, a reader writes to Wolverson, asking that: "I am getting regular emails and calls from a company in Kuala Lumpur offering an interesting investment opportunity. I have no idea how they got my contact details but after I did some basic research on their web site, it does appear to be genuine. Should I part with my money?"
Please go to the website to read the answer offered.
7DAYS distributes a total of 75,000 copies per day from Sunday to Friday in Dubai and Abu Dhabi targeting homes, offices and public places, meaning it is able to reach a fast-living, hard working urban English-speaking audience in the Middle East.
And our reputation seems not so good.
Thanks Joanne for the alert.
Comments
I can smell our Minister is going to demand an apology and retract from 7DAYS...
Posted by: patriotic1994
|
January 2, 2009 08:57 PM
This reminds me of a 4 page piece on Malaysia I read on 22 December 2008 in the International Herald Tribune which painted Malaysia as a great place to invest.
My first impression was, "Wow, IHT dedicated 4 pages to Malaysia? I can't believe my eyes."
Only to realise later that it was a paid advertorial.
From the looks of it, it was paid for by the Iskandar development project thingy. I can't remember the other companies that was "featured" in the piece as after realising that it was an advertisement, I just skipped the whole thing.
Fortunately, "smart" investors will notice the different font used and the words "paid advertorial" and make their own informed decision.
Posted by: kelvinlym
|
January 3, 2009 03:36 AM
It's really sad to read this. Why are we getting this bad publicity? Is it warranted? There are so many other MNCs which have invested in our country, and what does this say to us? I really wonder...
Posted by: Lisa Lee
|
January 4, 2009 12:42 AM
so, who's the real 'Clown'? Who are behind these dodgy schemes? Cronies?
Posted by: calvin_fernandez
|
January 5, 2009 01:27 AM
Well, Wolverson has a point. If it is the truth, then it should be published.
Posted by: DP Interworld
|
January 7, 2009 12:49 PM
He's just providing a fair warning; he's not saying "avoid all Malaysian companies".
After all, Malaysia *IS* the land of "skim cepat kaya" (get-rich-quick schemes). Almost every week, you'll get news of cheating cases, pyramid schemes being shut down, or other financial fraud. Don't forget that our own govt also intermittently issues warnings about "skim cepat kaya". So yes, "hotbed for dodgy schemes" does sound right.
Plus, what the 7Days reader describes does sound like a boiler room operation.
As with any major investment, you need to conduct research and due diligence.
Posted by: Lee Meng
|
January 7, 2009 04:23 PM
but again who is this Wolverson ? What authority does he have in commenting about malaysia? Financial analyst are all crooks, see what happen they do to the world economy? not to mentioned the giant ponzi scheme in the US of A. How much he knows about Malaysia anyway?
Posted by: bolanliap
|
January 9, 2009 03:42 PM
The Star, Jan 14:
Civil servants banned from taking part in get-rich-quick schemes
I rest my case. LOL
Posted by: Lee Meng
|
January 15, 2009 09:17 AM
2 interesting articles I have come across.
Article 1
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/01/10/AR2009011002236_2.html
The article above (last paragraph on the 2nd has more details), indicates there is a network of companies in Malaysia aiding Iran to get banned US technology.
Article 2
In a rather longish article in the New York Times, I came across a reference to a Malaysia company, the Malaysian Smelting Co. this is a company listed on the KLSE but it looks like the majority shareholders are Singaporeans.
The relevant page is below.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/16/world/africa/16congo.html?pagewanted=4
on the 2nd last paragraph on this page, it implies that Malaysian Smelting Company is buying Tin from international brokers who source from the conflict zone in Congo.
the exact extract is :-
The flights land in Goma, the provincial capital, where other middlemen buy and process the ore for export. Alexis Makabuza’s Global Mining Company is one of these buyers. Amid the sorting and cleaning equipment of his rudimentary processing plant sit dozens of barrels of tin ore. On each is stenciled the address of Malaysian Smelting Company Berhad, a major tin smelter. Mr. Makabuza said he sold to the company via a minerals broker.
Further reference to Malaysian companies buying tin from warlords in the Congo is here from the BBC
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/7723988.stm
The extract from the BBC article is below :-
Located predominantly in India, China, Malaysia and Thailand, these smelters sell tin to component manufacturers.
So while Malaysian Smelting Co buys from an international broker, it can request that they not source from Congo. If you read the entire article you will realise that buying these ore’s are only lining the pockets of these warlords and destabilising the country.
I e-mailed the company but they have not replied. I would have not replied too in similar circumstances.
Posted by: Sans
|
January 16, 2009 07:05 PM