Moving house... ( 3 )
Let's count the eggs now that they are hatched.
In GE2008, the BN won 140 seats, while opposition parties won an unprecedented 82 seats. The Opposition now outweighs the BN backbenchers 82-77.
These are what the BN has in political capital, pointing to the fact that Ketuanan Umno is still dominant and minority groups could do nothing to strike a ground-rule change in the incumbent's political system:
- Umno (79 seats)
- MCA (15)
- PBB (14)
- SUPP (6)
- PRS (6)
- SPDP (4)
- UPKO (4)
- MIC (3)
- PBS (3)
- SAPP (2)
- Gerakan (2)
- LDP (1)
- PBRS (1)
And now, this is why the Sabahan politicians are considering themselves as the King Makers of Malaysian politics -- they helped Umno to retain absolute power, but they get the crumbs when it comes to payback time, counted in the currency of ministerial posts and pork barrel economics that come with it.
Another Sabahan leader has put it in a crass and crude manner: You move into the bungalow, but you are given room next to the toilet.
EXPIRY DATE. On the other hand, the King Makers do have an expiry date, Quote Yong Teik Lee of SAPP on why he set an August deadline for Abdullah:
"The fasting month will be September, Hari Raya in October and Umno elections in December. I think the maximum we can go is August for our issues to be settled. After December, Sabah will be forgotten again.
We in Sabah, will go back to our subservient role, quietly go on with our lives, or it will explode, other players will come in. Other players will come into the Opposition, people from outside the BN will take the forefront, not us."
What is left unsaid is that Umno will come after the 'disloyal' component parties once the tai ko puts its house in order after the party election by the end of the year. BN/Umno should have a file on each of them. That's why I said should Operation Moving House take place, it has to be swift and clinically decisive.
In the final analysis, Umno is the dominant party in the 14-party BN coalition. It's a fact. As the tai ko in the Ketuanan Umno agenda, the 62-year-old party occupies 22 ministers' posts in a Cabinet of 27 members -- not forgetting that Umno commands and controls a whooping 81% of the Cabinet representation though it only contributes 56.4%, or 79 out of 140, of the seats collectively won by BN component parties.
Is this BN's "power-sharing" formula that Ong Ka Ting is talking about? The more it changed the more it remained the same for Malaysian politics, or so it seems.
But there is a way to drastically reduce, if not totally remove, Ketuanan Umno in Malaysia. Hijrah to where political tsunami has resulted!
Comments
nail-biting stuff this. almost too scary to contemplate. looks like there are still factors to give the tsunami further momentum.
Posted by: nick m
|
May 14, 2008 10:33 AM
The way you have put it, and the timing of your article seem to hint that migration is imminent. Though I am not a proponent of "migration philosophy" as I feel it goes beyond the good core value of politics as per my own defination, I would welcome it nevertheless for the fact that the Federal Government's inability to cooperate with the opposition state governments poses an administrative challenge that undermined the spirit of democracy.
Though migration seem to be an evil by itself, the administrative obstacles seem to me a greater evil that we need to tackle at the moment.
Posted by: kowlat
|
May 14, 2008 10:44 AM
yes, we voted for long term change...thus far, Penang n Selangor administrations under PKR seem positive. Keep up the good work.
As an islander, can we have further update on what's happening on tourism cooperation ? http://thestar.com.my/news/story.asp?file=/2008/5/2/focus/21113515&sec=focus
Posted by: islandglades
|
May 14, 2008 12:27 PM
High powered position be given to accommodate?
Is somebody high up there going to be blasted and dislodged of position very soon?
Posted by: aku anak malaysia
|
May 14, 2008 10:56 PM
I've been studying Sabah's electoral roll. I find it surprising that 92% of Sabah's voters are without house numbers. There are 14/25 parliamentary constituencies where nearly 100% of voters are without house numbers (NoRumah). When I look closer, almost all of these are registered only with a "Kg ..." address. What kind of economic development is this when 9/10 voters do not have proper addresses, and have to use a common village address?
See our study here: http://malvu.blogspot.com/2008/05/norumah-no-rumah-more-than-13-voters.html
Posted by: Seng
|
May 15, 2008 01:48 PM