Screenshots

Jeff

I believe your first link to chinese news is wrong.

By the way, I pity these RC, they been played and fooled around a like monkey by TDM, TEC and VKL....

Reading one account of the RCI proceedings, one would misssed some details. The Malaysian Bar has its reporters and they do have some details. Now what was the original motive when a Copy of the Clip was given to lawyer Manjit Singh way back in 2002? The Lohs were not happy as they could not get a "fees refund" from Lingam and Manjit was not paid his fees. Lingam was acting for Loh’s father (90+ then & Lingam was insisting he came personnaly for the refund) and Lingam was sued by Loh’s mother over a matrimony case. So was it revenge & hatred? Never mind about Anwar’s motive in Sep 07.

Further Lingam says “It looks like me and it sounds like me”. He said he was not going to say anything more until the original recording had been verified. The defence of Lingam’s hinges on his IMPOSSIBLE demand of the “original” copy of the Video Clip. It was first recorded in a memory card and resided in the Sony 707 Digi camera. The purpose of the memory card is for recording purpose and has limited capacity and its full content must be transferred out for further use. So the “original” is lost forever and Lingam is now insisting that without the original he cannot get the clip verified as he had read literature and research that states “that authenticity cannot be established without the original recording and when he had the original recording, he would send it to his consultants to verify its authenticity”. In this respect he & his lawyer must have been grossly misled. A duplicate would faithfully reproduce the original otherwise how will the “original” CDs and Cassettes be made for sale? More details at:
http://powerpresent.blogspot.com/2008/01/more-pics-lingam-insists-on-original.html

Be not afraid. Remember the 7th day of the 7th moon of the chinese calender. It comes around every year. When all Hell breaks loose these bozos will be nailed one way or another.

If he has denied that he is the one in the clip, why did he answered questions meant for the real "VK" in the clip?

Why did he said he was sure it wasnt Ahmad Fairuz on the other line, when he denied he was the one on the line? Unless he is 'god' and he can listen into teleconversation between "VK" and "Ahmad fairuz ".

Come on, RC , you may not be clever but pls do not be seen to be "stupid" ! You may want to stand these nonsenses but don't expect us to share your "stupidity".

Guess where they got ideas to give those answers...???
from Total recall...
from The Simpsons
from Band of Brothers
from Groo... hell on earth...