Screenshots

Evidently, TIME magazine senior editors went rusty on history and cock-ed up on some chronological facts about their Person of the Year 2007, Vladimir Putin, dubbed Tsar of The New Russia.

According to Rory O'Connor of Global Vision, there was a serious discrepancy between the "FULL" and "COMPLETE" versions of the TIME transcript of its interview with Putin for "Person of the Year".

O'Connor claimed that a glaring factual error was edited out of the transcript in an attempt to spare top executives embarrassment over an exchange at the beginning of the chat between the Russian leader and Time Inc. Editor-in-Chief John Huey, managing editor Richard Stengel and deputy managing editor Adi Ignatius.

The official version of the transcript, as it appears on TIME's web site, is prominently labeled "Putin Q&A: Full Transcript". It begins like this:

TIME: Despite the cold war, Russia and the United States have found themselves aligned in many of history's big conflicts: World War I, World War II and now, thanks in large part to your response to 9/11, there seems to be some alignment in the war against Islamic fundamentalist terrorism. With that history in mind, how do you envision the relationship between Russia and the U.S. going forward?

PUTIN: Indeed, Russia and the U.S. were allies during the two tragic conflicts of the Second and the First World Wars, which allows us to think there's something objectively bringing us together in difficult times, and I think?I believe?it has to do with geopolitical interests and also has a moral component. Of course, the cold war marked a tragedy in relations between our two countries, and I wouldn't want to see the vestiges of those relations prevailing in the future?

However, an earlier and more "full and complete" transcript of the interview, posted last week on MediaChannel.org -- a part of GlobalVision -- but which originated on the New Zealand site Scoop.co.nz, has an entirely different beginning, one that may make Time's senior executives look bad and, perhaps, incredibly obsequious:

QUESTION: Mr. President! First of all, I would like to thank you on behalf of all my colleagues for your hospitality today. Second, we consider that it is a great honour for us to be able to conduct this interview. Your cooperation with Time magazine means a lot to us. Its result will be a serious material, and quite broad in nature and scope.

I want to start with the first question. You were born in 1946 - I was born in 1948. We belong to the same generation. We grew up in countries that lived with the unavoidable presence of the enemy. But historically, and in most major conflicts - World War One, World War Two - Russia and the United States have been allies. And now, in large part thanks to your role, Russia is cooperating in the struggle against Islamic terrorism.

In view of our history, how would you predict the development of relations between Russia and the United States as they resolve global problems in the future? How would our generation assess their future prospects for cooperation?

VLADIMIR PUTIN: If you will allow me, I will correct you a little bit on certain dates. I could not have been born in 1946 because at that time my father was suffering from the wartime wounds and my mother survived the Leningrad blockade. After they had lost two children and their health it was unlikely that they could have thought of having another child right away. And I think it is for that reason that I was born a little later, in 1952. But this does not change the essence of the problems and the issues you raised - this is absolutely correct.

The crux of the discrepancy, as O'Connor argued, was that TIME, 'America's leading putative newsweekly', couldn't even get the most basic fact about Putin right -- namely his date of birth -- something Mr. Google could get done in 'just 3.2 seconds' (O'Connor had timed it)!

"Admittedly, being off a mere six years about a world leader's age isn't, well, the end of the world. But Time's embarrassing inability to get even this very basic fact correct certainly leads one to question its trustworthiness in other, far larger matters of fact and substance," O'Connor said.

"Moreover, its apparent attempt to cover up the error - and to mislead the public by posting an incomplete transcript and billing it as complete - is even more egregious," he added.

We were told that O'Connor contacted TIME for an explanation, but to no avail.

"By the time I called Time for reaction, John Huey was unavailable, having already left for the holidays," he said.

"Managing Editor Richard Stengel was still around, but failed to return several phone calls seeking a "full and complete" explanation of Transcriptgate," he added.

O'Connor can be contacted at Roc @globalvision.org or Tel: 212-246-0202 Ex. 3009.

BACKGROUNDER. MediaChannel.org is a nonprofit, public interest Web site dedicated to global media issues. MediaChannel offers news, reports and commentary from its international network of media-issues organizations and publications, as well as original features from contributors and staff.

MediaChannel is concerned with the political, cultural and social impacts of the media, large and small. It exists to provide information and diverse perspectives and inspire debate, collaboration, action and citizen engagement.

Screenshots has been collaborating with MediaChannel as a monitoring post for the region.