SMS Scam ( 3 ): Let the suffering fools speak
READ THIS SERIES if you are a mobile user!
Teaser: 3xxxx short code and SMS scam
SMS Scam ( 1 ): Explain this, Maxis
SMS Scam ( 2 ): It's an organised white-collar crime
SMS Scam ( 3 ): Let the suffering fools speak
SMS Scam ( 4 ): The bad boys... Celcos? CPs? MCMC?
SMS Scam ( 5 ): The 'Copy & Paste' version of Maxis Preventive Gateway
SMS Scam ( 6 ): Transcript - Rosli Shukor's parting shot at MPG on May 14
SMS Scam ( 7 ): MPG API - Now you see (May 15), now you don't (May 16)!
SMS Scam ( 8 ): How big is the gravy train for multi-passengers?
SMS Scam ( 9 ): What's up, Doc?
UPDATED VERSION. Just two instalments, and the SMS Scam series has drawn responses from ( 1 ) Screenshots readers who realised they were being scammed and provided me with proof; ( 2 ) CPs who instructed their PR agencies to set up private meeting with this blogger, agenda unknown; ( 3 ) Local SMS gateway providers who wanted to give "their side" of the story. I will cross the bridge one by one, listening to them with an open mind.
For simple rule of thumb, the 3xxxx short code does indicate the Celco that had assigned a particular short code to an external CP. Just look at the second digit of the short code.
For example, a 32xxx or 37xxx would have the CPs coming from Maxis, which now carries the 012 and 017 prefix. 33xxx or 39xxx will have come from Celcom (013, 019) and 36xxx is the short code assigned by DiGi (016).
Maxis Hotlink runs an External Content Provider search engine that helps you determine the name of the CP who does a MT delivery on your handset.It's located at http://202.75.163.40 or this URL:
http://www.hotlink.com.my/level2/hotlevel3.asp?aid=3344
However, it is more important for you to know that Premium SMS CPs are getting nastier by the day. There are basically four types of SMS Spam and SMS Scam models.
Type 1: Simple Marketing SMS Message
This type is sheer irritant. It requires a mobile user's response and input. Usually no charge to the user when the SMS terminates on your handset.Type 2: Straight-forward Charge
Once the SMS is delivered to your handset or mobile terminal, you are charged and and you have no way of refusing it. There will not be price information available. Your Celco will share the revenue with the rogue CP usually on a 50:50 basis.Type 3: Message Appears As FREE but Already Charged When Delivered
This is scary. The user is charged and you are unaware of it!Type 4: User Charged for SMS Non-Received
This is even scarier. The mobile user is charged by the Celco's and their CPs when the mobile don't even receive SMS message!It is scariest when this modus operandi is combined with MO Spoofing I talked about yesterday. You don't know when and who hit you, but your Celco will make sure you pay for the scam while they split the revenue with their CPs, 50:50!
Right now I am just waiting for Maxis to provide an answer to my question -- as an aggrieved party scammed by MT&T and billed by 012 who split the ill-gotten revenue -- yesterday. They can't say they don't read my blog.
This month alone, I have received three messages sent via 3xxxx short code that I didn't subscribe to, or solicited for. I will post how much I have been charged once the next Maxis bill gets delivered in my email.
For the moment, let's give some space for the suffering fools among Malaysians scammed by the Celcos and their external CPs to have their say.
READ ON... I am publishing the first batch of five emails from Screenshots readers on the basis that is a matter of grave public interest that involved millions of scam money.
Email #1::
From: Devakumaran Palnisamy
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 4:32 PM
To: 'customercare@maxis.com.my'
Subject: FW: Maxis bill statement Account 811727742 dated 21/02/2007
Dear CEO,
Having visited www.jeffooi.com today, I had for the first time in months reviewed my Maxis statement.
To my amazement I had been billed for 'External Content Provider' service as evidenced on page 4 of the above enclosed statement.
Now - I did not subscribe to the above services - period.
I am furious to note that I am billed for services that I never requested, require or utilised.
Firstly how did this third party content provider gain access to my mobile number?
Secondly, I never subscribed to the services - why have I been billed for the same?
3. I had called up Mobile365 at 03-6201-2617 and was informed that based on the short code number 32180 - the services allegedly provided was of some gaming services/results. And apparently the billings of RM 0.30 was an error and that the same has been 'refunded' by Mobile 365 to Maxis and that Maxis would be refunding the same in 'two to three' months time.
(a) Now for Maxis to bill me for alleged services provided by Mobile365, it must have entered into an agreement with it. Hence
(i) Kindly provide me the details of Mobile365 (Company name, address, contact number) and the name and contact details of the contact person in Mobile365.
(ii) Did Maxis disclose my contact details Mobile365?
(iii) What is the relationship between Mobile365 and Maxis(or any one or more of its holding, subsidiary or associate
company)
(iv) Is Mobile365 in any way associated (directly or otherwise) with Maxis (or any one or more of its holding, subsidiary or associate company)(b) If what Mobile365 alleges is true,
(i) then why have you not informed me of the alleged 'error' billing
(ii) then why have you not refunded the same to me
(iii) why are you still withholding my money
(iv) what recourse do I have against Mobile365 and Maxis
4. Kindly forward me a copy of our original contract of service as the same was not made avail to me at the time I signed up as a Maxis subscriber as I would like to explore my rights.
5. I'll take it that this matter will be handled with the utmost urgency. It goes without saying that a detail explanation and reversion of the 'illegally' billed amounts will be made instantaneously.
Please note that I do not wish to receive any such services or SMS anymore.
If you cannot offer a plausible written explanation within 24 hours, then kindly terminate 012 service with immediate effect.
Warm regards
Deva

Devakumaran... Maxis February 2007 bill
Email #2::
From: andrew choong
To: jeffooi.screenshots@gmail.com
Date: May 17, 2007 10:13 PM
Subject: SMS Scam
Hi Jeff,
I read your posting on SMS Scam. Here, I have attached evidence of such SMS scanned from my bill. Not only I received SMS from MT&T, I got another from ISentric.
Best regards,
Andrew Choong

Andrew Choong... Maxis April 2007 bill
Email #3::
From: Khoo Kah Jin
To customercare@maxis.com.my
cc: jeffooi.screenshots@gmail.com
Date:May 17, 2007 10:33 AM
Subject: External Content Provider
Hello,
I do not recall suscribing for the following contents. In fact, I have a personal distaste against SMS spam!
External Content Provider / Pembekal Kandungan Luaran
01/04/07 15:45:34 MT&T SMS 36936]013-203 3100 5.00
02/04/07 16:32:14 MacroK SMS 36881]0321643273 3.00
02/04/07 16:35:34 MacroK SMS 36399]0321643273 4.00
08/04/07 15:21:41 MacroK SMS 36399]0321643273 4.00
08/04/07 16:06:34 MacroK SMS 36881]0321643273 3.00
15/04/07 15:22:04 MacroK SMS 36399]0321643273 4.00
15/04/07 16:06:59 MacroK SMS 36881]0321643273 3.00
22/04/07 15:21:56 MacroK SMS 36399]0321643273 4.00
22/04/07 16:06:54 MacroK SMS 36881]0321643273 3.00
9 items 33.00
SubTotal 45.42
Why am I paying for this rubbish? They're not only annoying as hell, but for the past few months I've been charged RM40-RM45 each time! My number is 012x945278. I'm sure I'm not the only one. Please respond and get me off this content provider's list!
Jeff, Hope you don't mind that I looped you in :) and thanks for bringing this into light!
Regards,
Khoo Kah Jin

Khoo Kah Jin... Maxis February 2007 bill
Email #4::
From: yik wen <
Date: May 17, 2007 11:25 AM
Subject: Extra charges
Here's my case.

Yik Wen... Maxis April 2007 bill
Email #5::
From "V. S. Narayanan"
To: jeffooi.screenshots@gmail.com
Date: May 17, 2007 10:53 AM
Subject: Maxis Bills With Content Provider Charges
Dear Jeff,
Maxis has allowed unauthorised content providers to charge for contents which was not only not requested for but also not provided.
Please refer to my attached bills in pdf format for December 2006 and for January and February 2007. These have charges NexNation SMS from 33500 / 03-7494 4832 .
I tried sending an SMS to 33500 to stop these messages but to no avail. The same goes for the 03-7494 4832 phone number provided as this was not answered.
Then I sent an email to Maxis regarding this matter. I have also attached a copy of the email with the reply from Maxis.
Maxis stopped charging me for the NexNation SMS effective from the March 2007 bill.
For your information, please.
Long Live The Bloggers.
If not for you all, many of us will still be in the dark over many of the illegal activities committed by the Government as the mainstream newspapers do not highlight these wrong doings.
V. S. Narayanan

Narayanan... Maxis December 2006 bill

Narayanan... Maxis January 2007 bill

Narayanan... Maxis February 2007 bill
Email #6:
From Ratormo
To: jeffooi.screenshots@gmail.com
Date: May 17, 2007 5:51 PM
Subject: SMS Scam ( 2 ): It's an organised white-collar crime
Hi Jeff,
I refer to SMS Scam ( 2 ): It's an organised white-collar crime blog entry. This problem has been going on for several years now with no end. And even if Maxis refunds your claim(others will still suffer from Maxis), the problem would still crop up later.
The only way to make sure that they listen(don't waste your time hoping the MCMC will do something) is to sue them or bring the matter to the small claims tribunal. If there is a need to set up a legal fund for you and the other crusaders, we, the rakyat are willing to contribute. all you have to do is to set up the mechanism and make sure that everything is above board. Ini Bolehland, rakyat terpaksa berjuang untuk keadilan!
Ratormo
Are you listening, Mr MCMC?
Comments
Jeff, you and the others who have written here have so eloquently set out your grievances here. Why? just because the crooks and thieves here sit happily in some air-conditioned office?
Fact of the matter is all you guys have been way-laid. Your pockets have been emptied and if not for body, your pride has been injured. Tell me, how different is this from if you were mugged, snatch thieved, robbed, way-laid or whatever? How different are these thieves from those guys on motor-bikes? No different isn't it? So why waste time writing here. Take the evidence and go straight to the police!
Ah!, But out police? Now that is another story isn't it? If it was crooks on motor-bikes they are happy to act....No political fall outs there. Now this kind of thieving, you will need to have the attorney general directing the IGP and he then directing the commercial crime division and so on. And to get the attorney general to make a statement, the ball has to start rolling with a pissed off UMNO MP who brings this out in parliament. Pak Lah has got to hear it and get sufficiently a earful and then he has got to direct the attorney general.
Now if I was one of those crooks how I'd wish the ACA will take over the investigation. Afterall they are so good at exonerating anyone important that they investigate. Now that being the case, are you wasting your time bringing up this subject?
Posted by: Observer
|
May 18, 2007 09:07 AM
I once bought a prepaid in Paka, Terengganu. Everytime I topped up, an unsolicited sms is sent to me, by an external content provider, and BY RECEIVING THE UNSOLICITED SMS, I was billed 2 ringgit. EACH TIME.
I threw away that simcard. I didn't complain because it was a small cost to me.
But multiply this experience by hundreds and thousands to the millions, siapa yang untung???
Somebody somewhere is robbing Malaysians in broad daylight, and they wear with white collar shirts.
Ini semua case tiuna singwich ni.
Posted by: Hansac
|
May 18, 2007 09:16 AM
From 2004 to 2005, I had on many occassions received charges from my telco for ECP services that I never requested, required, utilised nor received.
At that time, my telco stand was, it's your phone no therefore it's yours.
Despite my numerous requests, my telco refused to block SMSs from ECPs nor to pre-filter out their charges, if any prior sending out the statement. I had to pay first only to be credited later on a goodwill basis!
Moreover, in no circumstances did I gave my consent nor authorised my telco to charge me . And obviously my telco could not provide me the document when asked.
I did not enjoy what my telco had put me thru nor agreeable that they had chosen to act as collecting agent for the ECPs; moreso in my case, unauthorised. Since then I gave up my few lines with them.
We being users have very little control as long as the telcos insist to act as the collecting agent for the ECPs. Can they?
Posted by: ckk
|
May 18, 2007 10:31 AM
MCMC, please do something! The rakyat is suffering.
Posted by: Daily Nibbler
|
May 18, 2007 10:34 AM
Hi, Jeff,
Since this matter of SMS spam and scam is already out in the open, I would like to offer you the email correspondences I have had with both MCMC and Maxis' customer care over the past two months. They are nothing confidential. Everything is at my blog below.
SS Quah
Penang, Malaysia
ssquah.wordpress.com
Posted by: SS Quah
|
May 18, 2007 11:36 AM
Sigh.
The Celcos are sticking their dirty fingers up our arses and charging us for it.
By the way, all the grouses seem to come from Maxis users. How about the others? Do tell.
Posted by: AverageJoe
|
May 18, 2007 11:37 AM
Dear Observer,
Thank god you are not running the country. A crime under regulation are subject to respective regulated body to carried out the job. Only if the crime go beyond regulation. Bare in mind that Bolehland IGP are not professional enough to handle such case! Not unless it involve "hard core" crime that IGP are expert on it. (woops)
Think about the reason of country like USA establish FCC. And think about FBI vs their police forces.
------------------
Now where is the ball going to ding dong? MITI? Since it involve consumer rights. But MCMC are suppose to be regulate the telco.
Let me borrow entry from wikipedia on Mobile phone spam
-------
On 12 April 2006, Singapore authorities has imposed a SGD$150,000 fine to mTouche content provider for unauthorised Use of End User Information and Unsolicited, Chargeable SMSes.
On October 5, 2006, the California Public Utilities Commission issued a settlement decision in Utility Consumers' Action Network (UCAN)[1] v. Sprint Telephony PCS[2], Case 05-07-021[3]. UCAN alleged that Sprint violated California law by sending customers unsolicited text message advertisements for Sprint services and charging customers $0.10 per message[4]. In the settlement, Sprint agreed to stop charging customers for Sprint advertisements and committed to identifying and fully crediting all affected customers[5].
On January 31, 2007, a federal court preliminarily approved the first settlement of an unsolicited text message class action in the United States[6]. Under the settlement, class members are expected to receive as much as $150.00 per person[7]. The lawsuit was brought under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991 -- a federal statute designed to combat unsolicted calls to cellular telephones, paging devices, and fax machines. The lawsuit was brought by Blim & Edelson[8], a Chicago-based class action firm.
----------
Let's come back to Bolehland, see the US year 1991 protection act? See that. Now check MCMC back home, and now check what happens to the biggest animal show in the country.
The unscrupulous CP and associate telco should be punished.
Posted by: moo_t
|
May 18, 2007 11:37 AM
I remember there was a similar case in Singapore where a subsidiary of a MESDAQ listed SMS service provider had charged mobile users there for unsolicited or opt-in premium SMS services. Subsequently, the IDA (i.e. MCMC equivalence in Sg) there acted on it rather quickly, fined the company for a few hundred thousand Sing$$ and also banned it from offering SMS service.
The above is just a recall from my memory. Sorry I could not be more specific on this as I don’t have time to do the research and provide more details. May be some good fellow blog readers can assist, google around and provide the missing links or details. For the new case that had been dug up by Jeff, I am sure many many millions of hard earned ringgit of many many thousands ordinary and hard working Malaysians are at stake. These are fellow Malaysians who may not have the luxury of POST-paid mobile phones and itemized billings. MCMC must do something and punish those who cheat and steal. And do it fast, no matter who own or behind these companies or whatever form of goodies (e.g. pink forms, nice food, karaoke sessions, nice chocolate, attractive monthly “rent”, etc) offered by them.
Posted by: Niuku
|
May 18, 2007 12:11 PM
I was maxis prepaid user for almost 9 years. Have rec'd alot of Spam SMS and do not know if I was charged or not. That's one of the reasons why I stop using Maxis.
Posted by: lamdog
|
May 18, 2007 01:48 PM
I have been working in one of those SMS sending companies before and based on my experience, big TELCOS are partly to be blamed but the main culprit is not them.
Basically there are alot of independent SMS services companies in Malaysia which had been generating profit tremendously and some even been offered the MSC status for tax exemption prior to it declared as an IT company.
These companies generates profit through SMS contents subscriptions where users will be charged upon receiving smses. Part of the charges (as in profit) will be given to TELCOS upon agreement.
It is the responsibility of those small companies that has been operating to be ethical in this issue. The company which I had been working did have the policy of non returnable charges.
To counter the attack, i think one will have to personally go to those sms companies to request for removing of your number which is called (MSISDN) for their term from their database.
Else, you'll need to know specific sms to send to the shortcodes(owned by the companies) to terminate the charged sms subscriptions.
Posted by: alicia
|
May 18, 2007 02:01 PM
Thanks for highlighting this matter. Prior to this I seldom scrutinize my Maxis bills. I am a low usage user and was thus shocked that I was also scammed without my knowledge.
External Content Provider / Pembekal Kandungan Luaran
16/03/07 18:48:49 MacroK SMS 32066]0321643273 3.50
1 item 3.50
SubTotal 8.65
I shall be emailing Maxis for a refund and an apology. Thanks.
JEFF OOI says: Please email me a screen capture of the SMS Scam records.
Posted by: daniel
|
May 18, 2007 02:17 PM
Hi Jeff,
I now have very good reasons to terminate my 012 line which I have been intending to do for some time.
Thanks for the expose.
Bye Maxis... Hello Digi ???
Posted by: JacknJill
|
May 18, 2007 04:42 PM
MCMC issued a guideline to the CPs and telcos that all premium SMSes, whether solicited or not, should carry a price indication in the beginning of the message.
Thus, if you had received a free SPAM from the CPs and telcos, it would read:-
"RM0.00: xxxxxxx....." or "PERCUMA: xxxxx" or "FREE: xxxxx......."
If it is a charged or premium SMS, it would read somthing like:-
"RM1.00: xxxxxx....." or "RM4:xxxxxxxx", depending on how much the price of the message.
Do go through your list of received SPAM to see if there is anything of that sort.
BTW, do be aware that Maxis & Celcom charge for their customer care number, so keep to the point. Insist on talking to someone soon and try not to let them put you on hold. It is already unfair enough that you have been wrongly billed.
Posted by: Sick Dog
|
May 18, 2007 08:24 PM
Dear Jeff, I also happens to be a (ex)SMS scams victim. which i have been charged for RM0.60.
16/01/07 07:33:32 iSentric SMS
36663]03-7875 1134
0.60
1 item
0.60
I have also notice that Maxis also charge user ( at lease it happened to me ) for the Easy Access Feature , even I did not use it. Be ware of that !!!
I have send the details to your mail box. Have a look on it .
:)
Jodern Yap
Posted by: Jodern
|
May 18, 2007 10:19 PM
moo_t
I don't know about it. But as for me it hurts just the same whether it is a drug addict mugger who has mugged me or a gangster who has whacked me or any of them names cited by Jeff who has conned me. They are all basically from the same cess pool of crooks who think alike. So they should not in any way be treated in kids gloves or silver thread. And I do believe we do not need any new laws to define their crooked ways. They belong in the same prison cell where the rest of the crooks go to. And being blue eyed boys with clean backsides they would deserve every thing the other crooks do to all these clean backsides don't you think?
Love to see some Datuks and Tan Sris go in assuming they are also in this racket for that is all that this is, a racket devised by crooks and vagabonds!
Posted by: Observer
|
May 18, 2007 10:45 PM
I have complained to MCMC with supporting documents on the unsolicited sms charges but to no avail. I suggest that we the consumers should act in a concerted effort to institute a class action suit against the perpetrators of these scams. Funds can be collected from the suffering public to finance the legal actions. Perhaps Jeff can help to get the initiative going and I am sure there will be many willing supporters. I am still keeping the bills with the unsolicited sms charges, just in case. In my case the culprit is acting in cahoot with DIGI.
Posted by: mohair sam
|
May 19, 2007 12:05 AM
I've had a terrible personal experience (prior to the registration of pre-paid numbers), I was being harassed by a +60176637158 and complained many times to Maxis but they claimed that nothing can be done unless I lodge a police report.
Even when I did, I firstly had to tell my tale to an officer and he made me duplicate it in writing - IN MALAY!
After the report, I had to call Maxis and was told to drive over to their service centre to lodge a formal complain.
Sigh, well, the stalker had his way. He hasn't called since the prepaid registration came into place, but I felt like a total victim - there is also no process for this crime.
And yes, I too have be wrongly billed and guess what, Maxis makes no apology but instead blames it on the CP and gives me the CPs name and number to call to lodge a formal complain. I never get any bill reversal - ever! I've complained several times too.
Posted by: NotesFromVenus
|
May 21, 2007 02:10 PM
Hi Jeff
Here is my case for this:
On the 10/04/07 at 04:55:02 Astro SMS 32999 RM2.50 was charged in my bill.
Why am I paying for this rubbish?As I know that I haved never register anything from ASTRO. They are annoying.
My number is (012)xxxx450. I'm sure there a lot of them out there being scam by all this nonsense.I'm not the only one. Please respond to my reply thank you.
Posted by: vsiong
|
May 21, 2007 04:46 PM