« Counter-blogs | Main | The paper that cares again »

Banned, YouTube seeks to mend rift with Thai Kingdom

April 4, Thailand’s military-appointed government blocked access to YouTube and several other Internet sites in a crackdown on online content that denigrates the country’s monarch, including a video clip that showed feet over King Bhumibol Adulyadej's head.

Thai government blamed YouTube for being 'heartless and insensitive' to the King.

YouTube owner, Google Inc., initially refused to remove the video. However,the clip was pulled out by the sender soon after Thailand blocked access to the video-sharing site that publishes user-generated content.

However, the government's action may have triggered a Round Two, according to Bangkok Recorder.

A second video slideshow attacking His Majesty the King suggests that the Thai government's ban on YouTube may be escalating into an online fight for free speech.

As YouTube and Google deleted the last images of the original offensive video, a subscriber using the name "Thaifreespeech" placed an new video attacking His Majesty on YouTube.

The video was viewed more than 7,000 times in one hour, attracting 160 comments, most of them strongly criticising the video clip and its maker.

The likelihood of more copycat inflammatory clips on YouTube and its rival video services suggest that Thailand could soon see further online blocks.



Banning only offensive videos, or entire YouTube?

Meanwhile, an AP dispatch picked up by MSNBC quoted Thai minister of information and technology, Sitthichai Pookaiyaudom, as saying that YouTube and the Thai government are discussing ways to end the impasse.

However, WIRED Blog Network's 27B Stroke6 reported that YouTube has agreed to create technical measures to help Thailand's military government block access to videos that insult the king.

April 5, Reporters Without Borders said that the Thai government's decision to block access to the entire YouTube site was made on 'shaky ground from a legal perspective'.

"The Thai government claims that it censors only pornographic Web sites or those that 'insult' the monarchy, but in fact it also blocks online publications that criticize last September's coup and Web sites linked to southern Thailand's separatist groups.

We wonder about the legal basis for this censorship, initiated by the government and implemented with diligence by the police. The closure or blockage of an online publication is a serious decision that should require a court order," the group stated.

April 6, Minister Sitthichai Pookaiyaudom told Reuters that YouTube will help Thailand block access to pages that contain clips offensive to its revered monarch instead of blacking out the whole site.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.jeffooi.com/mt32/mt-tb.cgi/1485

Comments

I think Thailand will soon realise that trying to censor the technological Hydra of the Internet is going to be a very tough exercise, just as Kerajaan Malaysia is going to find out as well.
Blocking YouTube's entire content is in the long run a self-injuring exercise.
Malaysia may emulate Thailand by blocking the entire Blogspot.com or Wordpress.com domain, again that's just going to attract all the wrong attention to the country.

Honestly I find those video posters very disrespectful.

these americans think other people have to follow their ideology of irresponsible freedom of speech and they even equate the king to their president bush.... really naive and rude indeed.

However, is Thailand going to ban the whole YouTube just because of a few videos? and the whole country people suffer because of this?

so if these naugthy monkeys post pictures of insult on Myspace, dailymotion, blogspot, forums, etc. etc.
is the thai government going to ban the whole internet? LOL

it is like our government banning blogspot, wordpress etc.

get real !

In Reply to Life Feel comment: these Americans think other people have to follow their ideology of irresponsible freedom of speech and they even equate the king to their president bush.... really naive and rude indeed”

I see no reason why you need to “attack” Americans per se’, first several of the posts on You Tube were from Thai nationals from inside Thailand. That is not to say that no Americans made posts either, but also could have been Americans, Canadians, Malaysians, etc. You made a statement without basis to support that is were Americans. Also as for Americans believing everyone in the world should follow their ideology of irresponsible free speech again has no merit here. First You Tube is an American site owned by an American company thus of course it will follow Americans point of view. Secondly you claim Americans freedom of speech is irresponsible, however do keep in mind that the free speech in America, Canada, the UK, most of Europe is what has allowed the people of those countries to keep their government in check and balance, unlike very much in Malaysia where the government is at will to do what it wants period. There have been too many cases in Malaysia where free speech was not found when ever someone pointed something the government did wrong, far too many times where people made silent. So yes I personally think that the west’s idea of free speech is to be up held and all countries should strive for it. Yes some will get hurt, some things will be said that is bad, that is what “courts” are good for, you do not like what something has been said, take the person to court for slander then, or better yet write a comment back. But when you start to shut people’s mouth’s up just because some (not all) people do not like what is being said then were does it stop, well like here it stops where to government dictates it to, where to government tells you what you can and cannot write about.

Also a reporter without borders which has condemned the blocking of you tube, is not an only American advocacy group but has representatives from just about every country and those representatives from those countries also want relaxed rules regarding freedom of speech.

I do apologize but this seems to be off target since the article was not about America’s influence over Thailand’s free speech. Thus I see no reason why America had to be brought down like that, to me that was nothing more then plain and simple anti-Americanism on here which had no basis to this discussion (oh by the way, did you see what I just did) instead of saying you should “not be allowed” to voice your opinion, I simply wrote back to countermined what you said, thus unlike your perspective where one would not be allowed to write on a certain topic, I accepted it (even though I do not like it) and wrote back in defense, now that is free and intelligent speech, after all what write does anyone have to tell me as a full grown adult what I can read or not read about.

INTERNET does not operate in a legal vacuum.
Read this before you post a comment in this blog!

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)