Blogs: Get the nation talking to itself
A casual conversation, in which I was an eye-witness, became the gist of an AFP story yesterday:
A Malaysian blogger sued by a newspaper for defamation denied Thursday that his articles were anti-government.
The government-linked New Straits Times Press (NSTP) filed a legal suit against Ahirudin Attan and another blogger, Jeff Ooi, over a series of items critical of government policy that were published on their sites last year.
"I don't write anti-government articles. (Articles) critical of the government, yes," Ahirudin told AFP.
Thanks AFP for bringing up an important perspective.
Bloggers, especially those who chose the socio-political genre of blogs, write for the sake of the country. I don't think Rocky's blog is anti-government. He is just plain pro-Malaysia. He offers critical commentaries on governance issues because he wants to see a better Malaysia. Just like most of us who put up a public face the day we started blogging.
Bloggers not shopping for revolution, but mindset can change
Bloggers, even when are are critical on governance issues, are not shopping for revolution to unseat the government.
What they actually do is leveraging the potentials of Internet and relevant technologies and applications to get the nation talking to itself. Very much the same notion Arthur Miller said in 1961.
Blogs and bloggers had become more and more relevant in Malaysia as the mainstream newspapers are being dominantly controlled by political parties that run the country, and business cartels aligned to them. So long as the Printing Presses and Publications Act 1984 is not reformed or repealed, practitioners in the mainstream media have to toe the line, and master-slave imagery becomes a fixture in the daily pages.
Blogs, on the other hand, could become the de facto medium to get the nation talking to itself, and we slowing witnessing this phenomenon buttressing in the opinion space.
Use blogs to give context to issues
Now, take the case of the privatised expressway concessions that Samy Velly had tried to OSA.
Starting yesterday, folks in mainland Penang are reeling in a new culture shock that Klang Valley folks have grown fatigue of fighting on. Outer Ring Roads have come to roost in their backyard in Butterworth -- Sungai Nyior, Bagan Jermal and Prai -- where expressway traffic will be discharged into existing infrastructure through four exits, namely Singai Dua, Sungai Puyu, Bagan Ajam and Bagan Dalam.
What the largest circulation English newspaper could afford was a 6-paragraph story, quoting DAP SecGen Lim Guan Eng. Can the active minds be muted while key questions remained unanswered?
And the question is: How did the construction cost of the Butterworth Outer Ring Road (BORR) jump from RM410 mil lionto RM700 million?
Previously, Samy Vellu had given a figure of RM410 million in Parliament when he responded to a question by Bagan MP Lim Hock Seng.
Next, in the name of transparency that the present administration seemingly advocates, will the concession agreement between the Government and BORR concession holder, Lingakaran Luar Butterworth Sdn Bhd, be made public?
That's a small context for bloggers to ponder a little. Because, as of now, the mainstream papers can only give you token column cm for a news story, while the Op-Ed sectiion shies away from most issues and ceases to play the role fit for the thinking generation.
The larger picture staring at you
Take the case of the privatised, expressway toll concessions again. Remember, these concessions award the operators some 32 years of rent-seeking.
A 25-year-old young graduate should realise that you have some good 30 years of career life. However, the toll will still eat into your pension for two more years after you have retired at 55 years of age.
Your children will take over where you left of upon your retirement, as new expressways will be built, and new concessions will continue to be given to the rent-seekers.
Bottom line, you get the quality of governance you deserve if you don't think aloud when thinking is still allowed.
How do we change our fate? How do we make a 50-year-old great nation greater? Let's get the nation talking to itself over this matter.
Comments
Gong Xi Fa Cai to you, Jeff.
Agree with you. Either we submit, call for defeat or we challenge where we see there should be justice for all.
All these expressways are not the first and last to be built with lopsided agreement and sure-win, sure-profit deals for the rent-seekers and their co-horts.
If we let the current government rot further, our children and grandchildren will see more of it in their lifetime.
Reason: More and more people managed to climb up the ladder into the corridor of power. And with their unsatiable thirst and hunger, they demand bigger and bigger piece of the cake. What is left to the commonners who elect them up in the first place?
Expressways is just one way of easy money, skim cepat kaya. How about the other licensing? Taxi licensing, printing of holograms, etc?
I think the stupidest of all are us, the voters who are sweet-talked, manipulated, and sold the country for a kain batik, RM200 or promises of building new vernacular schools, upgrading dilapidated condition of schools, tarring of the road in our housing area.
We will see more of it in the days to come. And it begins from the KLSE/KLCI. Hope not too many who come in the second wave gets burned this time around.
One thing is sure, the warchest is being built as of now for the GE. And these is the first wave which has since propped up KLSE/KLCI price.
Good luck.
Posted by: aku anak malaysia
|
February 23, 2007 10:25 AM
Jeff,
Agreed, what we are seeking to do is to make a great nation greater. We have to make known this fact from the very start. It is not about a developing nation anymore.
We are on the correct trajectory to arrive at Developed Nation by 2020. Hopefully we stay on course and make the necessary minor adjustments to fall on target by 2020. That minor adjustments is what we as bloggers seek to input.
And this should be our MISSION STATEMENT.
Posted by: Rajahram
|
February 23, 2007 10:55 AM
Getting silent whiners to join the conversation makes an uphill battle for two reasons: 1) "it's like that lah" attitude; 2) illusion of fear.
Both reasons are caused by half-century long of CONDITIONING. BN had been successful in engineering complacency and compliance. In my opinion, that was largely done through media hypnotism. But the people happily accept that, so they deserve what they voted for.
Besides conditioning the country, BN had also created an environment that condition themselves towards corruption. Given the stronghold rewarded by voters, corruption is the only natural outcome.
It's also because of that, I reserve from judging the individual governers for they are not held against any higher standard than a low life hustlers.
Contrary to professionals, the government is not made out of highly educated elitist. People make that mistake by giving standing ovation everytime a minister show up at a function, as if the people are the servants. Government are the aggregation of everybody, and therefore their quality is really the average of the entire population.
If we manage to elavate the intelligence of the entire population, strip the illusion of fear and plant the "it ought not to be like that" attitude, we might have a shot.
Posted by: GRex
|
February 23, 2007 11:24 AM
They really need to understand,
critic ≠ (is not equal to) anti.
Posted by: kenji
|
February 23, 2007 11:34 AM
I totally agree that the citizens of Malaysia should talk to each other as your caption rightly said The Nation should talk.
What we have now is a Government, elected no doubt, which rules by all sorts
of repressive and oppressive laws,Printing Press Act, OSA, ISA,discrimination,corruption, croniym .All are secret kept from the people who elected them. Why is it necessary to govern in that manner.If it is government in power to rule for the good of the nation without any qualification what are they afraid of?
Coser to the topic, it is time those in power realise that the public are beginning to realise what they are denied and opening their eyes and questioning all policies and their implementation . In this respect the internet and the bloggers are are providing a service which has been lacking for a very very long time as the socalled media is good only to spin the stories to make the govt look good.First,all the newspapers are owned by political parties and in addition subject to annual renewal of printing licences.So cannot expect the real stories to be heard. The internet and bloggers are standing for the vacuum the people experience.
As has been suggested, the opposition parties shhould come together and offer a crdible and cohesive alternative for the people to choose from.I think we are ready for a change of Govt.When such a choice is available, the next question is to reach those who have no access to internet, computers and bloggers.The opposition has to think seriously how that can be executed.
The present govt of 50 years has given us an opportunity to say sayonara to them. Can we take advantage of the situation?
Posted by: ksn
|
February 23, 2007 11:54 AM
Jeff, you are right on to keep the government on its toes. We need more people to monitor and point out the “goings on” and read between the lines especially over technical and complex government projects. Samy had deferred the Toll Collect at Sungai Nyiur and surely all the taxpayers AGAIN will pick up the tabs in the lost of revenue to the concessionaire company by way of the agreement.
These Highway Robbery traps have been laid long ago. The folks at Seberang Jaya & Butterworth have been using that route for over 10 years without paying and toll was NOT collected because the “whole BORR project was not completed”. But the Federal Government and the concessionaire company more than 10 years ago had agree to the toll. The residents were “smart” as they protested and appealed through the Penang State Government, which was very mindful of the “marginalization” tag hurled at them previously quickly responded and constructed 4 Toll-free linkages, reported by NST ONLY (15th Feb 07) (and one 300 m stretch was even fast-track at a cost of RM2 million). And BN fully aware of its implications (lost of these State & parliamentary seats) in the coming GE U-turned and deferred toll collection at Sungai Nyiur Plaza and Penang, Deputy Chief Minister Datuk Seri Abdul Rashid Abdullah hailed this as a “smart response”
The swift manner the announcement was made by SAMY (all the way from London) without even a possible nod from the Cabinet is surprising. All along, Samy mislead us to believe the Cabinet has the final say (example over the declassification of Toll agreements, he needed to put up a proposal etc) and now he can announced this deferment alone.
All the above and more details at:
http://powerpresent.blogspot.com/2007/02/300000-protested-sungai-nyior-toll.html
Posted by: mwt
|
February 23, 2007 12:06 PM
A democracy which stifles its citizens' voice becomes an autocracy. An autocracy which favours its ruling elites by closing an eye on their corrupt practices becomes a kleptocracy.
Is Malaysia a kleptocracy?
This is the question which all of us, including the judiciary, should be asking. After all, they know what they had to go through when checks and balances in governance were sacrificed for the expediency of implementing national policies that themselves were not given sufficient debate space to the very peoples who had to live their results everyday - the rakyat.
The toll agreements that are now thorns in every motorist's throat are just one example where if the rakyats' inputs had been taken, we would not now be in so much a quagmire that this umno govt had had to panic and invoke an executive statute (OSA was mentioned)in order to try and quell the tide of anger that says the rakyat have been had.
How many people know that as far back as ten years ago, this umno govt already knew its EPU/ICU divisions had fouled up big time on the terms of those agreements? How else could one explain the negative reactions even govt agency secs were showing without reservation even back then whenever those divisions were mentioned? It takes the former PM to admit in no uncertain terms that 'stupidity' sense was the cause. Honestly (if this word can still be used in this country), does he believe for one minute that the rakyat are stupid to think that stupidity was the reason?
The reason why blogospheres sprout in this country is because they are the only channels left for the rakyat to call for change, and the only reason why change is needed is because checks and balances have been displaced in the umno govt by a cavalier sense of self-importance and arrogance that just because the last elections gave them a majority, they can take it that the rakyat will be quiet when the elites ride roughshot over them. Come on, this is the year of the boar, not the bull.
We talk about tolls. We could just as well have been talking about the fiascos behind the procurement of the national ICs, parking meters, billboards, fumigation services, submarines, fighter planes, vehicle APs, KLIA floor tiles, assessments, conversions, approvals, what have you. What about things like InventqJaya, Mimos fabrication labs, sale of MISC freighters, commonwealth games accounts, bailouts, buyouts and boarshits on economic performances? Just as no answer forthwithed on why automatic windows can fail over three generations of the national car, and no answer will ever see the light of day on the 18 to be named, no answer will come out on whether approved FDIs were used as landed FDIs in order to impress the World Bank and if that doesn't work, 'low' inflation rates might.
In this country, you throw a stone, it immediately falls in a hole where money from the rakyat drains away to the pockets of cronies. The disease of kleptocracy has eaten the rakyats' contribution right into their bone marrows.
You want a number? An extra 30 million has had to be spent on repairs to the MRR2. Its toll has gone up by 60% in the twinkling of the eye. Some minister muttered that the contractor would pay. Don't blame the rakyat for asking now how much of the extra 60% includes part or full payment for the extra 30 million.
Bloggers don't wear Armani suits or three thousand pound sterling shoes . They don't eat in five-star hotels. They can't command special forces with C4 or emulex. They're not invited to open restaurants in faraway lands where nestle pristine mansions or alfalfa farms for retirement to soothe tired nerves from a lifetime of 'serving the nation'. Bloggers wear Factory Outlets or Reject Shops. Their shoes are Bata. Their diets are mee rebus and roti canai.
They're just concerned rakyat.
Just imagine - without blogospheres, how much more shit will run its course before the rakyat finally know the true and hidden costs of nationhood.
Some amongst the present govt admits they make mistakes. How does saying that reduce the chance of making the same mistakes again by new sets of politicians if there are no digital guardians of the rakyats' rights in this society?
Some amongst the elites take offense. Some even display astonishment. Why not do the most logical thing to set things right - rebut with privileged 'facts' in the same platform? That is how society grows mentally, gvernance matures its processes, mistakes minimised for the sake of future generations, judiciaries get to retain their roles as custodians of integrity, if not their souls of conscience.
Without checks and balances, all is lost. Innocence as much as conscience, integrity as much as progress. The very meaning of nationhood.
Posted by: Neil
|
February 23, 2007 12:23 PM
"Prime Minister Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi has given the nod for agreements on tolled roads between the concessionaires and the Government to be made public. The prime minister must be congratulated for listening to the wishes of the people. These agreements are signed during the Mahathir's administration. The ex-premier had acknowledged that the agreements are lopsided."
taken from here:http://khookaypeng.blogspot.com/
Sometimes, if you ask, persistently, your wish will be answered. Lets see what lies within when the time comes, that it is so secret.
Posted by: Jefus
|
February 23, 2007 02:07 PM
I have always believed that the truth will prevail. Trouble with this believe under the present circumstances is the cost may be too much until the revelation is achieved.
When spin doctors spin, I sometimes sigh; can the really expect us to believe them? Some of them are just so plain foolish and unbelievable that it's funny!
The truth is it is not funny. When governments don't govern effectively, with responsibility and transparency, the culture is perpetuated, and culture is difficult (but not impossible) to cleanse or re-do.
We should, and we must speak out. Yes, there is clearly a difference in being anti-Government and being critical of he government.
A united voice may seem nothing, but remember the power of the spoken word of the written one have been known to topple and tumble great misdeeds in our time.
May God bless this nation I call home.
Good luck Malaysia.
Posted by: Bahaman Abu Bakar
|
February 23, 2007 03:17 PM
I agree that we should be critical of the goverment , however just dont be critical for the sake of beig critical. we need also to provide solutions to wat we ae critical of. What I have not heard is how the opposition is going to run the highways without tolls or do they intend to increase the income tax.
Posted by: mamboking
|
February 23, 2007 04:45 PM
I agree with mamboking. Talking and complaining is easy. Providing solutions isn't. We have a lot of people fighting for change, but not nearly enough. At the same time, we have a surfeit of complainers and blamers.
Yet, where are the people with constructive comments on how we can build a better country? They are so hard to find anywhere. They can't be found in our jingoistic and propaganda-based mainstream media (except maybe The Sun). They're almost as hard to find in alternative media like blogs. Where are they? I wrote about this not too long ago, because I believe that if we want a better Malaysia, we need more commentary on solutions, not blame:
http://www.infernalramblings.com/articles/Malaysian_Socio-Politics/136/
Posted by: johnleemk
|
February 23, 2007 07:22 PM
a thick bunch of ideas and solutions was posted almost two years ago in this blog.
whither?
to add some more; think about this:
1. bloggers utd sends invitation to cabinet to meet; bloggers utd announces on www that it has sent invitation to cabinet to meet.
the meeting will be about the evolution of blogosphere in the context of national governance.
the strategy is to find a common platform to create new protocols of communication so that this country's thinkers will not be equated as unionists versus management in a paradigm that would otherwise says govts are governors which they are not; they're public servants.
2. the opposition front has to be rebranded; right now its foci are navels of women, chastity belts, jossticks, karaoke mikes, tolls, peoples' living standards, bodysnatching, interfaith, education, health, the usuals.
to be rebranded, they must come together; to come together, they must have common hot buttons, burning platforms and red-ant issues.
summarise those issues, create a common manifesto and get them to debate it in six sittings.
3. the national intelligentsia of all the communities must come together independent of the govt.
bloggers utd can initiate; no hangups on any issue.
change agents can be anywhere - in the youth wings of the govt as in the opposition; just meet as Malaysians-lah.
4. the growth of blogosphere is not just because people get their climaxes from complaining, or for that matter, people get their highs from complaining about people complaining.
it's got to do with info-capture; something you write as a list becomes archivable for ages, and can later, presumably, be reused in settings completely divorced from when it was written; who remembers the last expletive in a mamak stall?
the agglomeration of ideas and information, perspectives and viewpoints, contexts and cleveries, will create a malaysian edition of a global worldview.
a global worldview is paramount for navigating and repositioning.
4. what do they fear? people who don't pay taxes and people who will silently boycott officialdom.
that's what they fear.
make use of it but only to the extent of driving home terang-terang the message that enough is enough (eIe is two-eyes between a nose bridge not without reason).
the logical conclusion by them would be that parliament will gain more divisiveness and whatever program that comes out after that will only receive equivalent tepid support.
the cost to the nation will be large; like a nuclear simul, everybody dies.
the very thought of that scenario should wake them up that they need to find another way acceptable to the majority.
5. two-thirds of... voting for opposition?
make use of it but set a condition;
both proposition and opposition are malaysians and national interest is not served by chasing one stance at the expense of the other but whether the gap between is big or small depends on mindset change which means education which means debate which means dissemination.
who's doing the dissemination at the moment? the ones at the organ-grinder.
6. what's this country's fundamentals? where are they? what can they become?
put the industrialist, agronomist, economist and lawyer together and get an answer that a govt cannot give because a govt is locked in its own box.
they-are-not-very-bright; even those in the backoffice; even those backburnered.
how many know exactly what's going on in places which are creating tomorrow's future in whatever segment you can think of?
you got to have that clear in your head so that your PM can stand at his putrajaya balcony, and instead of pointing here and there at how resplendent his putrajaya, will instead announce that starting tomorrow, so that we can best sg and hk, it will take no more than 1 day for any company to be set-up in this country, including telco lines, lofsa bank account, mida incentives and registration certificate printed on conqueror bond paper with a neat new logo.
operational benchmarks.
and apply them to the land offices, the bandarayas and all the crooked corners of this land.
set such targets, set their deadlines, and post it globally.
then meet again to see if done.
so many other things, trees, humps, security, road fatalities, education, health, environment, all the yipeekayeeas you can think of.
let's take a pew.
why are we doing what should have been done thirty years ago?
plenty more and only using the coccyx
Posted by: Neil
|
February 24, 2007 01:51 PM