« theSun missed it! | Main | Michael Backman will write about Malaysia again »

Others missed it too, so says theSun

Chong Cheng Hai, theSun's Editor, has responded to an earlier Screenshots blog entry, titled: theSun missed it!

Chong's email is published verbatim. But I won't expect theSun to print mine verbatim, if at all. Read on.

Mailbag
From: CHONG CHENG HAI
to: jeffooi.screenshots @gmail.com
cc: hichong @thesundaily.com,
hktat@thesundaily.com
date: Nov 18, 2006 4:19 PM
subject: Reply to "theSun missed it!" post of Nov 17

Dear Mr Jeff Ooi,

Thank you for drawing your visitors' attention once again to theSun's front page on your blog ("theSun missed it!" posted Nov 17), though this time it was not to praise but to ridicule and cast aspersions on theSun's integrity and ethics. The issue in question is of Nov 17 which reported on Razak Baginda's day in court.

I refer to your criticism of our use of "borrowed assets" regarding thephotographs taken by Utusan Malaysia and Sin Chew staffers. For your information and that of your visitors, who no thanks to your one-sided post, may now have the false impression that theSun is an unethical newspaper, sharing or pooling of "assets" during certain assignments is an accepted and common practice among news organisations. Even international wire agencies "buy" exclusive photographs from domestic newspapers for transmission to subscribers around the world. The photographs of Razak Baginda being brought to court were transmitted around the world, courtesy of AFP and Reuters. Nothing unethical about that, contrary to what you insinuated in your posting. No prizes for guessing where Reuters and AFP got the photographs from.

I confess, we are guilty as charged - theSun's photographers "missed" that crucial shot of Razak Baginda. And rest assured, chief photographer Raj Kumar has to answer for it. But why put only theSun in the dock? Equally guilty were the dozens of other professional photographers and TV cameramen crammed outside the Kuala Lumpur courts that morning. Onlythe photographer from Utusan acquitted himself or herself and was lucky that day and we salute and am thankful to him or her for that. It was impossible to cover all angles in such a chaotic situation, given the tight security.

Before you rushed to judgment, you should have focused your amateur lensman's keen eye and examine the evidence, that is images of Razak Baginda which were used on the front pages of The New Straits Times and The Star and quite a few other papers that day. I'm sure you'd notice that they were uncannily similar, identical in fact. Yes, those images were the same ones captured by the lucky Utusan photographer.

However, there is one glaring difference between what the other two English papers didn't tell their readers and theSun, to its credit, did. theSun credited Utusan and Sin Chew for the photographs. Similary, many photographs taken by theSun's photographers were used by various newspapers, but we didn't always get the credit. One recent case was the acquittal of Sukma Dermawan of sodomy charges.

I leave it to you and your visitors to judge which paper was ethical. Surely, all fair-minded visitors will find in our favour.

I hope that, in fairness, you will publish this reply in full so that your visitors will get the complete picture and not rely on the version cropped to fit your biased views of, and to support your unfounded accusations against, theSun and its team of highly dedicated editors and professional photographers. Limited though theSun's resources are compared to our more established rivals, which I'm sure had more photographers at the scene last Thursday, I assure you that ethics and integrity are in plenty supply.

Our priority and obligations are to serve society at large and in particular our growing number of loyal and appreciative readers spread across the peninsula. Though we are a free paper, we operate on the same foundation of truth, fairness, integrity and ethics on which all good newspapers zealously guard, some less so than others.

The odds are stacked against us, but we do our utmost each day to get the news and images which matter to print. And that sometimes includes using "borrowed assets", as you so sarcastically put it, if we have to.

There is no shame in using images taken by other news organisations, which are not our rival. theSun is not alone in this, but I can proudly say that theSun stands out by duly giving credit where credit is due.

Thank you.

Chong Cheng Hai
editor
theSun

JEFF OOI says: Just why can't theSun stop being defensive but to think positive?

The latest tirade from the paper has nothing to do with its integrity and ethics -- the way the Editor had framed it -- but the fact is: it had merely lost a photo-opp, like many others did.

To be the best in the game of modern day's mainstream media -- in the way the Editor put it -- theSun had aspired to excel, and sometimes, has more "balls" than the rest. This should go on, and Utusan could one day "borrow" theSun's pictures, and not the other round as in the case cited.

Was Utusan's photographer plain 'lucky'? May be yes, may be no. Perhaps he/she had worked harder at the shot, while the rest, like theSun, missed it.

Anyway, I should thank the free-of-charge paper for reading Screenshots and know what I blog. I must confess I have theSun sent to my house at 30 sen per day in the last three years or so. And I DON'T buy any other English paper except theSun.

Why? Because I wanted it to survive with my little but meaningful support, though there's only one -- not 2 or 2.5 -- readership accountable from my household.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.jeffooi.com/mt32/mt-tb.cgi/1061

Comments

are you going to be the pundit that will expose the mis shots of all photographers?

dude...

u're just like the govt... likes to promote wastage... in ur case it's of time... am sure there are better things to blog about, like your analysis on umno ga for instance.

JEFF OOI says: Farish A Noor has a better blog which I can't possibly outdo, so I won't reinvent the wheel. That will be wastage if I did that.

Read Farish's ‘Amok’ Season Again: How We Perpetuate The Myths Of Empire.

at least the Sun has the courtesy to xplain. well done

i still dunt see teh reason of Jeff's postings on theSun missing out the shot. wats the fuss??

What Chong describe is true, I have worked with him and he is a pro indeed! I remember the time when Anwar first day at court, everyone missed the shot except The Star; I was the Pic Ed then...like Chong said u CANNOT cover all the positions all the time. For Anwar I assigned EIGHT photogs and yet that exclusive shot was also a LUCKY shot!
i think Chong was upset because those published were actually pix sold to Reuters and AFP... I wonder how much they pay Utusan ;)
Hey Chong! Hi from NZ! I am watching you... keep up the good work! Like Jeff, I also think the ONLY paper worth reading in Malaysia is still The Sun!

I second mandelism. Don't believe theSun has done anything unethical and they have clearly explained.

"we operate on the same foundation of truth, fairness, integrity and ethics on which all good newspapers zealously guard, some less so than others."

this bit is meaningless since they have a journo who has encouraged (read - childish tantrum) limits on freedom of speech.

so, to the sun and all other mainstream media: just shuddup and do your job. i will do mine in constantly trying to read between the lines to understand what is REALLY going on.

I was telling myself I will never again read theSun. But Chong's email to Jeff changed my mind. I will at least pay attention to the frontpage from now on, because NOW I know theSun DOES HAVE editor who fight for the news and report it, even lack of photo(s). I like that attitude and we all should praise them. What I DON'T LIKE was theSun accusing others for winning or ahead of them. Don't do that anymore, please. It remind me of certain group of people who refuse to move forward yet blame others for taking the advantage. OK, theSun is now forgiven. Please do not repeat the same mistake. Bloggers are watching you...

jeff i just read farish's article it's a great article on the malay sub-anthropological study but there's no comments abt the UMNO GA per se in detail. it merely touched upon it.

Is thinking Aloud on UMNO not allowed by the keris waving idiots?

Jeff, I am a bit disappointed. Arent there more pressing issues than this. We need cheerleaders rather than boo-leaders in this post-umno-assembly climate. And please replace Guna's photo with a mug-shot of the wanita umno matron who was not there at Tiara's ex-husband's funeral. She is one of those who as a teacher (I stand corrected, if wrong) is turning our national schools into religious camps.

Jeff, I wouldn't exactly call that a "tirade". A tirade connotates a screechy, annoying, and ill-reasoned rant, none of which would appear to describe Chong's letter (IMO).

But I do agree with you that the Sun is by far the best English daily published on paper today in Malaysia. Of all the English newspapers, they are probably the least biased, and I make it a point to read it whenever I can.

zorro... when you want to say something, say it.

don't be a 'waste'. ;)

Ok, we must give chance to Chong, for being frank and bold enough to apologizing even we all know that it's impossible to cover all angles to capture a unique shot.

But then again, I must also say that those who works in newspaper regardless of their position, they do spin a lot.

When you miss a photo, you miss and that's it. What it got to do with integrity and ethic?

Chong spent 80% of the letter spinning and spinning. By right, he should just explain why and how the photo ops is being carried out to let the reader understand how it's impossible always be top of the game and so on.

But then again, it's just about photo and nothing more. The Sun did a good job so far and please, make it better with all these constructive criticism.

Excellent Chong. At least you came out and explained the situation. Same can't be said about your EIC, Kay Tat. Wonder he even notices things like this? Toooooo Bussssy konon.

I bet my last dollar that Raj will have a fantastic excuse for missing out the picture. Well Raj this is not the first time, and I bet it will never be the last too. Maybe theSun should get a him a Camera that works from his desk. Does this guy go out at all?

Anyway, good job Chong....but others at your fort...mmmm...I don't know.

I can accept Sun's explanation that newspapers share photographs with other friendly newspapers all the time.

But instead of Telling It As It Is and admitting that Sun's resources are limited and therefor must rely on friends for help, Mr Chong has to drag in --- er, you guessed right --- Star and NST whom he said also missed the shot of Razak Baginda.

Reminds me of the Klang town councillor who said he didnt submit building plans for his mansion becos the others also didnt do it.

If Mr Chong wants to split hairs, how come Sun didnt get the names of Razak's daughter and brother when Star and NST and the others did. Befor Mr Chong say this is not important, let me hasten to say it is becos there were a few important quotations attributed to the anonymous daughter and brother.

What were Sun's highly dedicated professionals (in Mr Chong's words) doing in court? 1. Did not know how to ask?
2. Too afraid to ask?
3. Couldnt be bothered to ask?
This doesnt reflect too well on chief news editor David Lee Boon Siew and the editor himself.

Also Mr Chong tried lengtilly to justify the exchange of photographs by saying Sun's photo of Sukma was used by another paper. Yeah right. For every one Sun photo that another paper use Sun uses 9 photos of other newspapers. Fair exchange indeed.

INTERNET does not operate in a legal vacuum.
Read this before you post a comment in this blog!

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)