Screenshots blogger on TV2, tonight
UPDATED VERSION. It was a night where we four had too much to share and too short the time.

At the studio after the live telecast...(L-to-R) Siad Huey, Jeff, YB Lau and Kuik
Anchorperson Siad Huey was forthcoming when she named Noh Omar in her quotes about the controversy related to Chinese schools the deputy education minister recently stirred up in the Parliament. She said mainstream media, especially those catering to the Chinese community, was put on a tight spot when issues such as this was anticipated by the readers, but due to sanitised reporting -- not knowing whether it was due to media control -- people resort to the online media such as Merdeka Review, for alternative views.
I had a lot of respect for Kuik, the senior editor at Sin Chew. I had expected him to be an echo chamber in support of media control as he works in Malaysia's largest circulation Chinese newspaper,whose printing and publications licenses were suspended for months during the Lalang Operation, 1987. However, when I 'challenged' him and the mainstream media, instead of clamping down on online media, to fight for more freedom under the Print Presses and Publications Act, he said the 'struggle' has been a sustaining process, albeit behind the scene. However, he said controlling the media is a practice no longer tenable as the world is moving towards a higher level of transparency.
Often times, he said, whenever there were instruction from the power that be to kill-off certain stories, or whenver ministers said they had been misquoted by the Press, it was done in a manner of haste, and readers were left clueless of what actually happened, and doubts prescipitated. It's here that mainstream media must manoeivre to protect its credibility, he said.
Lau, on the other had, advocated regulating the media, be there mainstream or online as prevailing laws are already sufficient in dealing with issues that violate law and order. Hwoever, he thought that controlling and monitoring the media is bad as the country moves towards the Knowledge Economy, an area he had researched in the last ten years. You can Google him on this.
As a blogger, I said you can't make a broad stroke to demonise all bloggers and online media operators.There is a distinction between the penembak curi and those who blog with full-blown public identity, people like me, A Kadir Jasin and Ahirudin 'Rocky' Attan. That's credibility in action. Bloggers like us have been professional and ressponsibility since Day One we started blogging in the belief that we could use Internet positively to connect with our readers.
When Siad Huey related to tussles with The NST in 2004 and early this year, and with theSun recently, Lau jumped in to say that if bloggers were to be kopitiam operators, should the customers misbehave, who would you prosecute -- the kopitiam owners or the customers?
The producer ended the segment by airing the results of a street poll related to the live telecast topic conducted by the What Say You crew. It indicates that 53% vs.36% of the people tend to trust the online mediamore than the mainstream media.
I thought that was an encouaging statement about what has taken place on the ground.
Original Blog
This blogger will speak in the What Say You ( 你怎么说 Mandarin Forum) live telecast from 7 to 8pm tonight over TV2.
The topic is on Mainstream vs. Online Media: The Question of Credibility and Responsibility.
Fellow speakers are Johor State Assemblyman (BN: Gerakan) for Pemanis, Lau Chin Hoon, and Sin Chew Daily Deputy Executive Editor-in-Chief Kuik Cheng Kang.
Lau, who was trained in molecular genetics, is an Internet visionary who wrote about the concept of 'Internet Biologists and the Continuity in Virtual Knowledge Network', while Kuik and I first met way back in 1994.
The anchor/moderator is Lee Sian Huey, a practising lawyer.
There is call-in interaction with the viewers.
Outlines for discussion (问题):
Part I 要点:讨论为什么可以或不可以取代?
1.大马政府在今年年初呼吁大众不要利用网络媒体的沟通工具 如部落格(BLOG)来发表具恶意、诽谤或煽动性的文章在网上,否则政府将监管网络的部落格。此举动引起了许多部落客(BLOGGER)的回应。他们认为监管部落格是不切实际及浪费公款。你同意他们的意见吗?你对此事的意见如何?
2.那如果说政府真的要监管部落格,技术上是否有能力呢?部 落格是免费开设的,即使封堵“网际网络通讯协定”(IP ADDRESS),网友还是可以在其他国家开设或用匿名来发表文章。监管计划是否可以在大马有效实行呢?
3.在大马,网络媒体的发展和崛起已经得到了大家的认同和关 注。各种各样的网络媒体工具如电子报、部落格等等会不会 有一天取代好像报纸这类传统的主流媒体呢?你怎么说?
4.主流媒体的标准有许多说法,但归结起来有这样几项:权威 性、公信力和美誉度;能够影响那些掌控社会主要资源、具 有较强行为能力的主流人群,如政府官员、企业家、知识分 子、白领等;对社会意识起主导作用。针对这一点,你觉得 大马的传统主流媒体有没有比以前更具公信力呢?
5.继续前一个问题,那是不是因为传统的主流媒体的公信力不 够,所以人民才需要一个更公平和透明的资讯平台,从而促 使了网络媒体的出现?
Part II 要点:有需求就有供应,探讨一下网络媒体存在所带出的 社会角色和价值
6.看过了公民的意见,你们认同他们的看法吗?你怎么说?
7.有专家指出,言论自由应该在传统主流媒体如报纸上实现, 因为报纸新闻和专栏作者是公开的,有自律的防线。相对的, 网络媒体作者的言论并没有受到法律的管制,其文章真实和 准确性会有被大家质疑的可能。你认同这说法吗?
Part III 要点:不管你是网上作者还是纸上作者,只要是有责任感 和有良知就是好作者
8. 有专家指出,由于报纸杂志等传统媒体长期由部分人把持话 语霸权,普通人进入的门槛太高,所以其言论自由只能是部 分人的言论自由。而网络媒体因为门槛低,参与性广,所 以 网络的言论自由才是更加广泛、更有实际生活内容的自由。 你认同这说法吗?
Part IV 要点:言论自由是部分人的权利还是全民众的权利其实并 没有那么大差别吧?
9.有一位名人肖伯纳曾经说过:‘自由意味着责任’。网络媒体 比主流媒体更自由是不争的事实。然而这是否代表说网络媒 体的作者必须更具有一份自知之明的责任感,所发表的文章 的立场必须更清楚、更透明及正确呢?
Part V 要点:蜘蛛侠电影里有一个对白:‘当你的权力越大,你的 责任越大’(Great power comes with great responsibility)。网络 虚拟的言论自由某程度上象征了言论权利
10.最后一个问题,建议和忠告: 如何去选择一个好和对的媒体管道来获 取资讯呢?
Comments
To view online ..
Copy the following URL ... http://61.6.163.26/rtm2
in your Windows Media Player !!
>>File >> Open URL >> and copy the above URL ..
Posted by: anand
|
October 1, 2006 07:02 PM
At the end of the show, when the lights dimmed, you were eager to get away from your seat, what happened?
Got other appointment or you can't stand those guys?
Posted by: notolls
|
October 2, 2006 01:03 AM
Do you have the link for TV3 NT7 or 8TV.
Can watch online when i go travelling
www.malaysiandiary.com
Posted by: malaysiandiary.com
|
October 2, 2006 01:55 AM
Jeff, i think Lalang Operation is 1987 not 1997. I remember that time i was in Primary standard 5.
Since long time ago, i treat newspaper as "entertainment" only. I believe newspaper is under pressure not to publish any things that against certain "people".
Posted by: Ah Hong
|
October 2, 2006 09:49 AM
Perhaps jeff has nature calls. ;p
Posted by: Steve
|
October 2, 2006 10:55 AM
I still find it amazing that 36% of people still trusts local newspapers, this after all the crap they produced for years.
Really unbelievable, it would have expected it to have sunken to at least less than 20%
Posted by: Albert
|
October 2, 2006 10:58 PM