Hello The Star; Hello ABC... Ngam-ngam lah
Ho Kay Tat (read: The truth of newspaper readership) declares that theSun has increased its daily circulation from 230,000 copies to 265,000, effective today.
Of the 265,000 copies, dropping in the Klang Valley will be increased from 195,00 to 215,000 copies per day.
By so doing, Ho says his free paper will "reinforce our No.1 position in the country's top consumer region".
What has The Star, which publishes Star Metro with the largest base for classified ads in the country, got to say losing the pole position -- considering that Ho's claim may be gospel and indisputable ?
I have another question for the Audut Bureau of Circulation (ABC). Have you started to round up your Audited Average Net Circulation figures, and HOW do you round-up your figures normally?
Answer me straight. What's your audited average net circulation for theSun during the period January through June 2006?
Was it 200,973, or was it 230,000 as claimed and published-- cukup-cukup and ngam ngam ho 230,000?
By the way, this is what theSun has claimed (October 2, Page 3):

Question Time: Can I get my maid to rise early to collect more copies of theSun everyday -- now that there're more free papers to go around with -- so that when the Old Newspapers Man comes around my neighbourhood every month, I will carry more weight, and my maid can earn extra pocket money?
Don't get me wrong, ABC Malaysia.
I just want to do my part to make sure that you guys could gladly help theSun claim that it will have an ABC Malaysia-audited Average Net Circulation of ngam ngam 265,000 copies per day -- yes, rounded-up figures and all -- for the period July through December 2006.
Deal?
Again, to folks at ABC Malaysia, can you give us your straight answer to our simple question by the end of the week?

SOURCE: ABC Malaysia website
By the way, please update your website statistics urgently. Your last circulation update was for the period ending December 2005. theSun's historical figures weren't in there!
Comments
I am still perplexed as to how the ABC could audit the circulation of a newspaper that does not have a circulation in the first place! Let me explain. From what I understand (I have been in the newspaper business for more than a decade), a "copy" is audited as a "sale" if it's sold for not less than 50 per cent of the cover price. For eg, NST supplies about 10,000 copies daily to hotels in KL for 60 sen a copy, inclusive of delivery, so that's considered 10,000 sold copies in the ABC audit.
The Sun is a FREE newspaper. It charges you 30 sen if you want it delivered to you, but that's delivery charges. 50 per cent of nothing is nothing, so how does the ABC audit "nothing"?
The Sun's numbers - whether it's 230,000, 203,000 or 265,000 - are called Print Order. The Star prints probably 430,000 copies daily (print order) and sells 320,000 a day (circulation). The NST's print order is 153,000 and its circulation 127,000 (plus the 60 sen copies sold to hotels).
Logically, the ABC should start a new category just for The Sun. And logically The Sun cannot be allowed to boast that it's circulation is so-and-so because it does not have a circulation as we know circulation.
Posted by: lubok melayu
|
October 2, 2006 01:14 PM
I have never seen any leftover The Sun at any shop.
Anyway, lots of my lil cousins buy Sunday Star just to read Dear Thelma, no wonder they got good readership on Sunday.
Posted by: mahisasura
|
October 2, 2006 01:22 PM
Good point lubok melayu. Perhaps we can classify a new metric for measuring theSun's so-called circulation. Let's call it "number of copies chupped by mamaks to wrap nasi lemak bungkus"
Posted by: auyongtc
|
October 2, 2006 01:25 PM
Lol, but I don't think the Sun is THAT bad, auyongtc. The problem with them is they tend to be righteous and holier-than-thou, and some of their old writers have a view of life (eg councils) that's black-and-white-and-nothing-
in-between. When the Sun sticks to news and info, it's probably the best paper around (also because it's free). But when people like Guna, Zainon and even Ho Kay Tat try to mimic their mentors at the NST, that's when I'd chuck the copies I take to the mamaks.
But on a serious note, let's get Jeff to tell the ABC about the circulation vs print order issue. I'm sure NST will back up Jeff on this (and lift the firewall on Screenshots even - yes, they are desperate!).
I mean, look, everyday I go to the 7-Eleven at my place and take a copy of the Sun because it's free. My maid sometimes take a copy when my ma-in-law takes her shopping. And when I'm in my pet hang-out place at Damansara or Bangsar, I'll grab anothe copy (why not?) so that I don't feel naked not holding anything while waiting for friends.
In a day, my little househodl could have 3 copies of the Sun! At the Club, some more they send the Sun! Check out Vincent Tan's Bukit Kiara, they must send a couple of thousand copies a day to that place for the waiters and club members to take home and keep for the paper lama guy.
Scandalous, man. and you claim in your ediotiral today that you are NO 1 in Klang Valley!
Posted by: lubok melayu
|
October 2, 2006 03:35 PM
lubok melayu
nothing wrong with claiming to be the top. Gives you something to live up to.
I pay 30 sen to have the Sun delivered every day. I do miss the comics though.
and to the same commentator - I'm presuming you're having a dig at Citizen Nades. Leave him alone. If he doesn't keep chasing the Councils, who will? They are a law unto themselves. arrogant and largely useless. MPK is as bad as the old MPPJ. Hairbrained schemes - horses, ceremonial outfits, fibreglass palm trees, grandiose public lighting, shall I go on? If he doesn't keep mentioning these wasteful schemes, who will. I hope the Sun keeps it's civic consciousness alive.
Posted by: LLtwigs
|
October 2, 2006 05:24 PM
okay the thing that I don't get is, to put it bluntly,
siapa Jeff sampai ABC has to answer him?
JEFF OOI says: See, another Malaysia Boleh! He so tackles the person instead of tackling the issue. I am just THINKING ALLOWED, THINKING ALOUD. Since you didn't ask the question, I had to. I was expecting industry insiders' comments like Lubok Melayu's to surface, and I was right -- we do have informed professionals among my readers, as many as Empty Vessels like C-Fu.
Buah berangan dalam kota,
Direndang orang tengah hari;
Jangan tuan kata-mengata,
Takut menimpa hidung sendiri.
Posted by: C-Fu
|
October 2, 2006 06:47 PM
See the difference between empty vessels like me and informed professionals like you (I suppose) is you sounded like you demand people to answer "our" questions, while I do not (demand).
The way I see it, no matter what number ABC or you or theSun can dish out, it doesn't really matter. 'cause the figure will definitely be skewed, depending on who you ask. You're asking for statistic of a free paper la brader.
JEFF OOI says: You are missing the trees for thebush. What we are asking is public accountability of a professional bidy (ABC Malaysia) if its figures has been misrepresented in an advertisement. What's the actual Audited Average Net Circulation going by industry convention -- Was it ngam ngam 230,000 or was it 200,973. The variance must be ratified professionally. And industry insider Lubok Melayu has provided a perspective. Yes, in this particular case, you ARE an empty vessel.
Posted by: C-Fu
|
October 3, 2006 01:24 AM
Yes, mr. informed professional. You are asking for a _statistic_ of an _industry_convention_figure_ for a _free_ newspaper.
Free, in a Malaysian sense/context.
Industry convention newspaper, that is not at all conventional, both as in free, and as in it's different than other newspapers.
And a statistic(!), of something free that you cannot really make sure that people don't misuse the paper to bungkus, to sell it back to the paper lama ah pek, to cover their heads during this pouring season, or basically for something other than reading. How do you take that into account to get a conventional circulation figure is beyond a mere empty vessel.
Posted by: C-Fu
|
October 3, 2006 12:59 PM