« Utusan: Beware of Singapore ownership of our national assets | Main | One morning with Tengku Mahaleel... ( 2 ) »

No brownie points for media cops in Singapore

It's a classic case of Media Corp having to kowtow to Harry Lee's media cops in the island-state.

June 30, free paper TODAY -- owned by Media Corp, a twin of Singapore's media duopoly -- published a column by prominent blogger Mr Brown a.k.a. Lee Kin Mun. It was satire lamenting the rising cost of living despite rapid progress in Singapore.

MrBrown_060630.jpg
SOURCE: TODAY June 30, 2006

July 3, K Bhavani, Press Secretary to the Minister for Information, Communications and the Arts, wrote and published an opinion piece in TODAY, accusing Mr Brown of distorting the truth, and using his convenience as a columnist to becomes 'partisan player' in Singapore politics.

Quote the Government Woman:

Brown_bhavani.0.jpgMr brown's views... are polemics dressed up as analysis, blaming the Government for all that he is unhappy with. He offers no alternatives or solutions. His piece is calculated to encourage cynicism and despondency, which can only make things worse, not better, for those he professes to sympathise with.
.
Mr brown is entitled to his views. But opinions which are widely circulated in a regular column in a serious newspaper should meet higher standards. Instead of a diatribe Mr brown should offer constructive criticism and alternatives. And he should come out from behind his pseudonym to defend his views openly.

It is not the role of journalists or newspapers in Singapore to champion issues, or campaign for or against the Government. If a columnist presents himself as a non-political observer, while exploiting his access to the mass media to undermine the Government's standing with the electorate, then he is no longer a constructive critic, but a partisan player in politics.

Three days later, July 6, Mr Brown wrote in his blog announcing that TODAY has decided to axe his Friday column. His blog entry was picked by Straits Times, the other twin of Singapore's media duopoly.

Rare protest

Incredibly, in the sterile opinion space Singapore is renowned for, the censure of Mr Brown's column in TODAY has sparked a rare protest.

Yesterday, July 9, some 30 Singaporeans symnpathetic of blogger Mr Brown gathered at the busy City Hall subway station at 2.00pm for a silent protest.

Their signature couldn't have been any less clear. They all came dressed in brown.

Gone_Brown_060709.jpg

Reporters Without Borders has, on July 5, expressed its grave concern over the reaction from Singapore> Quote Julien Pain, head of the RSF Internet Desk:

"It reads like a warning to all journalists and bloggers in a country in which the media are already strictly controlled. The media have a right to criticise the government's actions and express political views. Furthermore, a newspaper's editorial policies depend solely on its editors. They should under no circumstances be subject to instructions issued by the government."

Meanwhile, the Singapore Government has defended its position that the mainstream media holds itself to a higher standard than articles posted on internet chart rooms.

The opposition Singapore Democratic Party has also issued a statement in condemning the censure, noting that the new administration of Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong has retained its top-down approach of old. "The wrapper may change but the package remains decidedly antiquated."

The law in Singapore states that a public assembly of five or more requires a police permit. Even so, a silent protest by four activists last year was dispersed by a squad of riot police.

Let's see who gets the brownies.

+ + +

Mr Brown, the de facto spokesperson for responsible blogging in Singapore, has a slogan to bloggers during the recent elections: "Prison got no broadband".

MrBrown_.jpg
Jeff Ooi, James Seng and Mr Brown in KL, 2004 - Pix courtesy Joi Ito

Now that he has found himself tripping on a landmine beyond the boundaries of the invisible OB markers (out-of-bound markers) of political expression, we can only look out for each other from afar. As it is, we are just a Causeway away from each other.

I must say I am fortunate enough to have a helping of his 'Bak Chor Mee don't want Tur Kwa' on CCTV. That's the possibly the best anecdote for a repressive regime that's standing like a sore dick in the First World.

Rocky's Bru has an earlier take on this.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.jeffooi.com/mt32/mt-tb.cgi/587

Comments

If only someone can invent a prison made up of bars that can imprison the thinking brain, singapore will be a happy willing customer. As of now all that she can do is dismiss, holler, sue, threaten, and institute fear. I suppose the formulae that has worked to date is the institutional adoption of instituting fear to gain from the population a conduct most palatable to the powers that be. Now that is Singapore for you. Thank you but I shall not have any of it and warts and all Malaysia is so much more preferable!

I thought the title of the article was very clever.

Seems a little draconian of the Singaporean government though.

Singapore is a world that is in chaos politically and socially. Their world is in dire straits because they do not trust themselves. The leaders see everthing as sinister and evil.

Their social institutions are set up to fence in the individual, rather than to allow the natural development of the individual. How can they survive the next hundred years? See my solutions at
http://powerpresent.blogspot.com/2006/07/dr-s-hawking-how-can-human-race.html

Folks

Singapore under the Lee dynasty is over sanitised and the society is becoming like computer parts with the Lee scions acting like micro chips ie Core Duo of intel.

And computers do get heated up and hard drives do crash.

Singaporeans are becoming more robotic by the day under the Lee dynasty

Never mind la. Make sure you make enough money and also save enough when you are able in SG.. And then just come over here to invest or "semi-retire" or whatever in Malaysia. We have more space here.. No worry.

Why Government has to respond to mr brown's comments
(AsiaOne)

Well-known local blogger "mr brown" was taken to task today by a second minister for his criticism on key government policies in his column in the Today newspaper, which dropped him last Friday.

Dismissing the various allegations which the 36-year-old Singaporean full-time writer had made in his weekly column as unfair and unjustified, Minister for Information, Communications and the Arts Lee Boon Yang said the Government was duty-bound to respond to such "distortions", which would undermine confidence in the Government, if allowed to spread.

In his last column published in Today on June 30, mr brown, whose real name is Lee Kin Mun, commented that the increases in taxi fare and electricity tariffs had come right after the General Election, at a time when a Government survey showed a growing income gap.

That invited a robust reply from the Government. In a letter published in Today on July 3, Ms K Bhavani, Press Secretary to the Minister for Information, Communications and the Arts (Mica), said his views "distort the truth" and offered no solutions. "It is not the role of journalists or newspapers in Singapore to champion issues, or campaign for or against the Government," she added.

The editors of Today suspended "mr brown" column last Friday.

Responding to media queries on the suspension the following day, Second Minister for Information, Communications and the Arts Vivian Balakrishnan said the mainstream media had a responsibility to ensure a certain standard of discussion in national debates, as it was not the same as an Internet chatroom.

Dr Lee reinforced the Government's position when asked by reporters this morning to comment on the suspension of mr brown's column after he launched the Singapore HeritageFest at Suntec City. (For his speech on the Singaporean identity, click here.)

"I think he made very unfair, unjustified comments on key government policies, and various allegations which are unfounded, of course, all under the guise of humour," said the minister on why the Government had to set the record straight.

"I think we are duty-bound to give a response to mr brown, to address his comments, and we did. We sent our response. We were just exercising our right of reply."

He warned that if such distortions were allowed to spread, it would undermine confidence in the government, and would make it more difficult to rally Singaporeans for national objectives.

Dr Lee said the mainstream media must be be objective, accurate and responsible for its views.

"And that's always been my position, or the position of this Government - that the mainstream newspaper must report accurately, objectively and responsibly," he said. "And that they must adopt this model that they are part of this nation-building effort, rather than go out and purvey views that would mislead people, confuse people, which will in fact undermine our national strategy!"

He added that as the Internet was often a free-for-all arena, certain critical and humourous elements were acceptable. It was not the Government's intention to chase after every posting on the Internet, said the minister.

Asked if the Government's actions contradicted his earlier statement about taking a lighter touch with bloggers, Dr Lee told reporters: "I said that we will look at how we can have a lighter touch in regulating the internet during the election. Mr brown's comments was not posted on his blog. If he had posted the same comment on his blog, we will treat it as part of the internet chatter, and we would have just let it be. But he didn't post it - he wrote it and published it in the mainstream newspaper. That's the difference."

Meanwhile, the police are looking into a gathering of 30 people who turned up wearing brown to support the blogger at city Hall MRT station on Sunday afternoon, in response to an SMS message that had circulated over the weekend after the suspension of mr brown's weekly column in Today, which sparked online postings by bloggers and netizens, mostly criticical of Today's move. (For ST report, click here.)

INTERNET does not operate in a legal vacuum.
Read this before you post a comment in this blog!

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)