Bullet Train & Crooked Bridge... ( 3 )
The Singapore government has confirmed what DPM Najib Abdul Razak said earlier in response to NST-YTL Corp's latest spin on the RM8 billion KL-Singapore bullet train project.
July 6, a day after the Rajan Moses interview with Francis Yeoh was published in NST-Business Times, Singapore's Ministry of Transport (MOT) swiftly clarified that there have not been any discussions between Singapore and Malaysia on YTL Corp's proposal to build a high-speed rail link between Singapore and Kuala Lumpur.
Significantly, Francis Yeoh was earlier quoted by Nurul Darni and Angus Whitley of Bloomberg News, and picked up by the International Herald Tribune on July 3, as claiming that "our government is very serious about this and they're encouraging us to look at it".
However, on July 6 when YTL and NST went to town to repurpose their spin, Najib told reporters at the Parliament lobby that "we would like to see proper submission to the cabinet first before we make an official government stand".
'Singapore's 48-hour silence'
It's not known why Singapore, which is renowned for advocating market transparency and for often taking swift action against rumours involving the country, has kept mum for some 48 hours after the IHT story had been transmitted globally, and only decided to clarify officially after Najib has spoken up.
Singapore's July 6 clarification was released by a Transport Ministry spokesperson through an e-mail response to Channel NewsAsia.
The ministry has also made a similar response to Bernama which raised the same question posed by Channel NewsAsia, said Oriental Daily News on July 7.
Singapore's MOT has since uploaded a one-paragraph statement on its official website.

SOURCE: Singapore Ministry of Transport
Malaysia and Singapore governments' denials had also been picked up by Associated Press and reported in MSN Money
July 7, Oriental Daily News reported in Pg 5, quoting a report in Singapore Business Times, saying that in view of the present controversy over the cancelled "scenic bridge" that led to a standoff between Dr Mahathir and Abdullah Badawi, some Singapore government officials are concerned that YTL's proposal might be interpreted as an attempt to replace the abandoned 'half-bridge' project.
'Stop it at JB'
Over the last 48 hours, the news about the KL-Singapore bullet train project has raised a lot of anticipation among the Johoreans. According to Bernama, the Johoreans wanted the bullet train, if it materialised, to terminate at JB instead of Singapore.
Reasons? They are convinced there will be obstacles coming from Harry Lee's republic. Quote Bernama:
They say if the government agrees to bring up the plan for discussion with Singapore, there will be a repeat of the episode which had brought negotiations over the Johor Causeway replacement project to a deadlock.
This is because of the republic's attitude of always demanding quid pro quo, they say.
Those who spoke up include Gelang Patah Umno division chief Abdul Aziz Sapian, Johor Chinese Chamber of Commerce and Industry deputy president Soh Poh Seng and Johor Baharu Member of Parliament Shahrir Samad, who is also the chairman of the Public Accounts Committee of the Parliament.
However, none of them has touched on the jewel on the crown -- Tanjung Pagar KTM land.
You may be delighted that the notion of 'quid pro quo' was first raised in Screenshots on July 6.
From Bernama:
"That is why we suggest to the government for the company's proposal to only connect Kuala Lumpur and Johor Baharu. "If it were to reach Singapore, we will face various difficulties. The price to get the republic's proposal will be very expensive. Therefore, it is better that we forget Singapore's involvement," he said. Johor Chinese Chamber of Commerce and Industry deputy president Datuk Soh Poh Seng supported the idea of having the high-speed train ending at Johor Baharu. He said that based on historical factors and previous experiences, Singapore was not a partner ready to cooperate, especially in projects worth billions of ringgit. "Why should someone in Malaysia struggle to provide a service which in the end will bring benefits and profits to Singapore?" he asked. Johor Baharu Member of Parliament Datuk Shahrir Samad, who is chairman of the Public Accounts Committee, recently said if efforts to get Singapore to agree took a long time, it was better for the bullet train to only connect Kuala Lumpur and Johor Baharu. Gelang Patang Umno division chief Abdul Aziz Sapian said he was sure Singapore would impose various conditions before agreeing to the project to ensure it obtained multiple gains from it.
Comments
if AirAsia have so much problem trying to land in SG, i don't think this bullet train thing will end up in SG.
Best if the train stop in JB and mayb later continue to SG. If we are to continue to SG, this will be another 1 of those project that probably not finish.
Such is the Asean spirit that MY and SG kenot ever agree on any matter.
Posted by: demio
|
July 8, 2006 10:10 AM
I agree it should stop in JB and then have a shuttle service into Singapore, least we have yet another spat like the one over KTM land in SG.
Posted by: Viceice
|
July 8, 2006 10:35 AM
why not connect to BKK instead...Thailand has bigger population and BKK is also hub for tourist from all over the world...imagine 3 hrs from BKK to KL..
forget singapore..
Posted by: art chan
|
July 8, 2006 12:31 PM
Half of singapore population were forced to quit Malaysian citizenship in 1963 and the other half comprised of Malaysian quitters. Why would they want anything that reminds them of a country that has dissapointed them.
Posted by: sydput
|
July 8, 2006 01:43 PM
I suppose the main purpose of this idea of linking KL and Singapore with
bullet train is to provide an alternative means of transportation to
people travelling between this two metropolis. The bullet train, if
built, will be too costly for ordinary people, at least during the
first few years of its operation. Thus, the option of having the bullet
train ending at Johor Bahru does not exist. It is either KL-Singapore or
nothing. Period. Stopover at other cities shall only be given consideration
at a much later time, when the project is right on track.
Of course the market factor is merely one (albeit of the most importance)
of the many problems awaiting the YTL corp's attention, should they somehow
manage to convince both governments. First, they will have to address problems
such as (1) land acquisitions, (2) compensations for affected families if
evacuations are required, (3) determination of route, which will definitely
involve political decisions at all levels (which can be very pricky). Assuming
that they have the resources (both monetary and technical) to complete the project,
they still have to confront problems ranging from maintenance to safety.
Like it or not, accident is bound to happen. Even the Japan Railway companies,
prided on having the safest bullet train in the world, had their first train derailment
accident during the 2004 Niigata Prefecture Chuetsu Earthquake (there was however an
earlier derailment in 1973 that involved an empty bullet train). So, what measures
will the company take to minimise accident? Moreover, accident of high-speed train is
going to involve great number of casualties. The problem is, are we Malaysians,
majority of which with third-world mentalities, ready for that? What actions will
the company and the public in general take in case of accident? Are our existing laws
sufficient to protect the victims in case of accident due to negligence on the part of
the company? Rather than being satisfied with obtaining superficial opinions of some
politicians, the mainstream media, in particular, should go on to interview experts in
various fields (transportation, civil engineering, law and etc.), and provide the public
(and the politicians) with a more thorough analysis. After all, this project, if
materialized, will have a great impact on the life of the people on both sides.
Posted by: Jin
|
July 8, 2006 02:04 PM
The foundation of KL-Singapore high speed rail is to link the two hubs. Stoping at JB? JB is a ghost town if not for the Singaporeans and Malaysians workers from all over the peninsular who commute to work there daily drawn by fat salary. Where is the critical mass to make the route profitable.If Singapore says no, the plan will just drop dead.
Posted by: wander
|
July 9, 2006 09:27 AM