Press photos: What press photographers say
Digital manipulation of photo-journalism... ( 4 )
Screenshots has attracted responses from the practitioner community who takes press photos as a profession. I will let the press photogs from the world's three major wire agencies -- Reuters, AFP and AP -- do the talking:
PAUL BARKER, Reuters Global Pictures Desk Editor:
"Reuters does not permit photographers to either add content to an image or delete content from an image. Reuters uses only a very tiny part of Photoshop's potential capability to crop and size pictures and balance the tone and colour."
The position statement was conveyed to Screenshots via Mark Bendeich, Bureau Chief, Reuters, Malaysia.
ROMEO GACAD, Chief Photographer, Agence France-Press, Asia-Pacific (Philippines):
"Newspapers must stick to the basic rule of photojournalism. Shoot it raw, and report it raw if a particular picture is chosen for publication."
Romeo covered two Iraqi wars, and was embedded for 41 days with the US troops in Iraq during the 2003 invasion. In April 2005, he was seconded for a one-year stint with The Star as the press photos consultant. He is now based in Manila.
VINCENT THIAN, Picture Editor, Associated Press, Asia Pacific (Malaysia):
"I'm very agreeable with what Mr CY Leow says: As photojournalists, we have the responsibility to document society and to preserve its images as a matter of historical record. But sadly in Malaysia, lots of photographers are forced to (get) pose pic due to the very limited amount of time given to each assignment, and newspaper editors sometimes expect the photographers to come back with the images they expected even it just didn't happen. They will still ask: 'Can you tell them to show you or pose for you?'
:( "
Vincent, who is the president of the Malaysian Chinese Photojournalist Association (MCPA), is currently speeding up the compilation of a "Press Photographers Handbook", which it intends to enable both the photographers and newspaper editors to know more about the responsibility of a news picture.
Photoshop editing
On February 19, Vincent posted in Asianphotog.org a note on Photoshop editing for news photographers:
A News picture must always tell the truth. We do not alter or manipulate the content of a photograph in any way.
The content of a photograph must not be altered in PhotoShop or by any other means. No element should be digitally added to or subtracted from any photograph.
The faces or identities of individuals must not be obscured by PhotoShop or any other editing tool. Only retouching or the use of the cloning tool to eliminate dust and scratches are acceptable.
Minor adjustments in PhotoShop are acceptable. These include cropping, dodging and burning, conversion into grayscale, and normal toning and color adjustments that should be limited to those minimally necessary for clear and accurate reproduction (analogous to the burning and dodging often used in darkroom processing of images) and that restore the authentic nature of the photograph.
Changes in density, contrast, color and saturation levels that substantially alter the original scene are not acceptable.
Backgrounds should not be digitally blurred or eliminated by burning down or by aggressive toning.
The topic is being discussed in Asianphotogs forum.
Not Bazuki
Meanwhile, Vincent said in the Asianphotogs forum yesterday:"I've checked with the newspapers, the picture was manipulated by the newspapers. NOT Bazuki."
Vincent's finding was confirmed by Bendeich, Reuters bureau chief in Malaysia.
Let's wait and see if NSTP Group EIC Hishamuddin Aun has anything to say. Screenshots will publish his comments verbatim when that happens. Hishamuddin was the Editor-in-Chief of Berita Harian at the material time the disputed Reuters picture was published on March 22, 2006.
Comments
You gave me much food for thought ever since you started with the first digital manipulation series.
As consumers we cannot avoid this practise, especially with the mentioned slimming ads or the half nude girls on glamour magazines. I remember either Kate Winslet or Drew Barrymore once had a beef with a particular magazine, claiming that they edited her cover photo so she would seem way slimmer than she really is. Negative message for her fans, she said, but the stinking truth is, a lot of people wouldn't buy the magazines if they featured the celebrity in their full bloom. C'est la vie and all that. On a more personal note, even bloggers are known to have digitally manipulated their photos to be posted on their blogs. It seems to be quite acceptable, nobody really cares anymore.
But that's trivial stuff. Forgive my ignorance, but I was not aware that this method is used in news reports. At first I was inclined to think that a couple of missing photo frames or three boys in the background... what's the big deal? The photo of Ummi Hafilda definitely looked more in focus with the frames discarded.
Then I remembered my Sejarah books with all the old, faded photos. I'd be crushed if the photos of 'desentralisasi' were manipulated; for some reason I have this strong memory of two cops by a guarded fence, sort of asking for identification from some passer bys. Imagine if somehow the fences were multiplied by digital manipulation (however they did it when they compiled the textbooks) -- that would make the students greatly fear the troubled past as they should, then proceed to be brainwashed [insert sentences of how every country's history differs from another to make them heroes]. I may be exaggerating, perhaps that was a bad example, but it doesn't change the fact that you can alter history 'sesuka hati'.
Those news photos, once published will be filed forever. Maybe one day they would appear in textbooks. Would be a shame if they were not entirely true.
/ends dua kupang
Posted by: suanie
|
April 6, 2006 08:32 AM
that would be 'you CAN'T alter history sesuka hati'. my bad.
Posted by: suanie
|
April 6, 2006 08:33 AM
Unfortunately, photograph is the last boundary of information manipulation.
We know news in the paper can be manipulate(by using words, tones), censored to act as propaganda machine.
Posted by: moo_t
|
April 6, 2006 10:54 AM