Shower, WiFi and missed reading
On a KL-New York SIA flight in 1998, during the deep end of the Asian Financial meltdown, I was asked a question in the survey form randomly passed to passengers in the economy cabin: Would you like to have inflight shower?
I thought it was an outrageous question, then. But with Airbus 380, it may be a reality for the first class travellers soon this year.
That makes me wonder how airport operators around the world are re-configuring their airport facilities to cope with emerging trends among globe-trotters and road warriors.
One that's top on my wishlist is to have airport lounges built out of the international departure terminals, which is the current norm in most countries.
Imagine, after you have entered the first port of entry -- normally the regional hub chosen by your airlines -- after a trans-continental flight and you have a layover of at least three hours before next flight begins. You want to stretch your legs, have hot, nicely-brewed coffee and a good shower. That's the problem. You have to go through immigration to have your passport stamped and you are whisked to the domestic flight terminals. After the immigration counter, you have also said goodbye to your airport lounge maintained by your airline, as it is normally located within the international terminal before the immigration.
So, you are left soiled, tattered, weathered after a 24-hour gruelling flight. You don't land in good shape.
One exception I found well-thought of is in Frankfurt, a city in the country of good engineering legacy. There is an American Airlines longue located after the immigration. It has only two shower rooms but the config is simply superb. It has toiletteries that normally come with finely apppointed 5-star hotels, andthe shower comes with jaccuzzi jets from four corners. Once you step outside refreshed, a host of snacks and drinks and liquor greet you with no stinge on hospitality. And WiFi is well taken care of by T-Mobile Hotspot.
The one in Hamburg is well integrated with security check process. You enter the airport lounge area after you have hand-carry luggages and notebook scanned. After your rest, you walk straight into your flight.
I need to mention Changi too. It allows me to get a good shower before I board the long-haul multi-stopover flight a couple of days ago. I'm a cleanliness freak but I think many of us would like to stay fresh so that we could get on with missed reading when flight takes off.
I remember one in Taipei's Chiang Kai Shek's airport when I had a transit of 5 hours. A simple instant beef noodle and plain congee would taste good after you have endures a week of steak and hamburger. And yes, you get to enjoy that more after a nice shower. WiFi is generaously available.
In comparision, based on my personal experience, Heathrow London is the worst for all four terminals. There's no shower facility and there is no WiFi. Are the Brits spending their time just on sex?
Comments
You are privileged to be pampered and indulged. For a different experience, come to Kota Kinabalu and smell our toilets courtesy of Malaysia Airports where airport taxes are high even for LCC but free DIY face wash at the washbasin and prayer rooms.
Posted by: dtsv
|
March 21, 2006 02:15 AM
I couldn't agree with you more, London Heathrow of BAA is s**t. People are herded like sheep and space is a premium. Forget about your shower or coffee, you would be lucky to find a space to sit. God helps you if you are stranded. You'll be told to move on (personal experience), due to security problems. The rate of the hotels near the airport is £180 per night.
What is in ample supply is the different types of condoms on sale in the toilets. Fancy a banana flavoured or ribbed ;) So, you conjecture may be correct. BAA sux !!
Posted by: wyse
|
March 21, 2006 02:55 AM
Hi Jeff
Air Canada is already ahead of the game. At London Heathrow, Air Canada has a lounge for arriving passengers. Once you clear Immigration and Customs, you exit and there is the Air Canada lounge. You can shower, grab breakfast before heading to the city for your business. I believe you can even get your suit pressed (i may be wrong here. It's been a while that I fly that route.
Posted by: ogre
|
March 21, 2006 04:05 AM
Are you sure ? I remember I took a shower at Heathrow before, but that's many years ago, it's chargeable but I don't mind getting freshened up before a flight. Things might have changed.
Posted by: Katak
|
March 21, 2006 07:52 AM
I will be heading to Heathrow this weekend for the first time. Let's see how does it stack up with the likes of Changi, Schipol and KLIA (my top three airport experience so far)
Posted by: penangboy
|
March 21, 2006 09:57 AM
In fact, in-flight shower is not economincal, because weight will increase the plane fuel consumption.
Most government threat airport as transition point than business center or leisure mall. Frankfurt airport is a good example of how airport should run. Don't be surprise when someone tell you they spend a good weekend there.
Posted by: moo_t
|
March 21, 2006 10:15 AM
If you are a member of a frequent flyer club, you should be generally able to get shower facilities in the home country of that club e.g. BA in Heathrow, CX in Chek Lap Kok, and SQ in Changi. In addition, if you travel within certain airline alliances, you should be able to use the main lounge of the "home" airline. I've flown Cathay to London, and have always been able to use the shower facilities of BA since they are part of One World.
For those who have no frequent flyer memberships, lounge facilities are generally limited, although most airports now have "pay-as-you-use" lounges operated by private operators. I'm not sure if Heathrow has a privately-operated lounge offering shower facilities.
Posted by: Godfather
|
March 21, 2006 10:29 AM
Jeff, are you referring to the airport lounges provided FOC by airlines privvy only to their top tier frequent flyers, business class and first class passengers? Or are you referring to public lounges which one has to pay to access? Well if it is the latter, I gotta say that you are one lucky sod ;)
Let's not just look at lounges per se. Let's talk a little about airport facilities. I for one, can't fathom as to how KLIA can possibly win awards for best airport, blah, blah, blah. Try being in the airport waiting for your 1.30am flight. Everything is closed short of a pub or two. So where do the passengers who travel cattle class get their coffee and something to munch on? Or is Burgerking opened 24 hours? TV? Well, since ONLY TV3 is aired in KLIA (and it is an INTERNATIONAL airport, I must add) there's nothing to watch since the station has already ended its transmission.
WiFi is available in KLIA but it connects at a relatively snail's pace of 11Mbps. Well, I guess beggars can't be choosers, hor? For those people who doesn't have a laptop or access to lounges, they would have turned bald from their hair-tearing antics as they try to while away their boredom. Yun Nam would do well setting up a booth in KLIA.
And if you are lucky enough to be on a non-MAS flight, you would have thanked your lucky stars as the plane takes off to your destination. Otherwise, be prepared to stay in this desolate, award-winning airport for another 2 hours till 3.30am, as I found out to my chagrin, when MAS delayed its flight to Shanghai.
Inevitably we are compared to our neighhbouring Changi Airport. In contrast, the airport is still a hive of activity during the wee hours of the morning. The majority of shops and food outlets are opened. Yep... bookshops, boutiques, liquor stores, Starbucks... they are all still open for business. Changi has plenty of work stations where you have access to broad band via LAN connected at a decent speed of 100Mbps whereas Wifi is payable. All this plus the free ubiquitous internet terminals which dot the waiting areas. Not only do they have special areas for viewing sports and news, there's also a cinema, I believe. Shower facilities? Available too, plus treadmills to boot for those who needs to sweat it out.
Which airline would wanna transit in KLIA when they can goto Changi which offers much better facilities to their weary travellers? Just look at the dearth of airlines flying into KLIA. KLIA is a major gateway to our country. MAB needs to be able to attract airlines to fly into KLIA. First, it generates more arrivals and secondly, Malaysians will also have a myriad of decent airlines to fly with. All in all, good for the economy and the people. When Thailand opens its new airport later this year, competition would even be stiffer in this region. Yes, whilst it is true that we are better than most aiports in this region, but why compare ourselves with the bad? This is merely scant consolation.
Posted by: Samarium
|
March 21, 2006 10:32 AM
Instead of buying paintings worth 1.5million, spend 1.5M on facilities that make people enjoy transiting KLIAPG by using MAS. Singapore has relaxing gardens, ponds, free trip to city, sentosa; Cinemax, LAN broadband, internet kiosk and now free OSIM leg massager at various area for your tired or cramped feet. Only wish Wi-fi is also free too. And with our 'duty free' (non-tax) cigarettes increasing price each time sin tax are increased, it is same price to buy there versus Malaysia and perception is it is also of higher grade due to control.
Posted by: Godbless
|
March 21, 2006 11:42 AM