« Guangming suspended for 2 weeks; TV3 untouched | Main | NST study-toured Independent UK »

Déjà vu? Same old, same old.

Early last month, I had a little chat with Parliamentary Opposition Leader Lim Kit Siang. I revisited one of his statements when Pak Lah had just newly taken over as the Prime Minister in November 2004 -- the honeymoon period, so to say -- in which Kit said he would give the PM two years to prove his mettle.

"Pak Lah's first two years (are) almost up. What's your take for now?" I asked Kit.

He gave me a tongue-in-cheek: "Who knows. Pak Lah may need two more years."

Like all newly-weds, honeymoon is perishable with an expiry date that escapes no one.

January 27, Malaysiakini editor Steven Gan wrote a prophetic piece about Pak Lah's administration, his first editorial in 2006 titled: The honeymoon is over. Re-reading it today, I felt like it has taken us only 27 months to cover genesis to apocalypse in politics.

Excerpts:

Same old, same old. If this has not been clear over the past two years of Abdullah Ahmad Badawi’s governance, it is now.

Mark this down - January 2006. It’s the month which has brought the greatest disappointment to those who have kept faith in Abdullah despite him being a willing partner in the old regime. [...]

Perhaps Abdullah has been oversold by his spin-doctors as a reformist. There is one cardinal rule in politics - you don’t promise what you cannot deliver.

This is not to say little separate between Abdullah and his former boss, Dr Mahathir Mohamad. There are differences, and significant ones too. But don’t expect the government to completely change its spots simply because it has a new man at the helm.

It is becoming clear that the forces of reaction - those aligned to the Mahathir regime - are slowly getting the upper hand in their battle for control within Umno.

As mentioned in this column before, Abdullah’s biggest mistake was not clearing out Mahathir’s sympathisers when he was at his strongest - just after the 2004 general elections when he romped home with an unprecedented majority.

It is ironic that Malaysians are already talking about the post-Abdullah regime only two years after the man was elected the most popular leader in the country’s history. [...]

That the government is going to spend less money in the 9th Malaysia Plan compared to the previous five years is an indication of the financial crunch. This is made worse when we have to soon meet our debt repayments for Mahathir’s years of profligacy.

This factional fight will continue in the months to come. And with Abdullahristas under siege, it is not surprising that the clampdown on the media has begun, with China Press being the first to be brought to heel.

When Mahathir became PM in 1981, then, too, there was a honeymoon period where the media was relatively free to debate and report on key issues affecting the country.

Let 1,000 flowers bloom, said Mahathir. That lasted three years.

We are just moving into the third year of the Abdullah administration. Déjà vu? You bet.

I shall quote Steven verbatim so that you get the raw treatment that I was shocked into.

The honeymoon is over Steven Gan Jan 27, 06 7:17pm

Same old, same old. If this has not been clear over the past two years of Abdullah Ahmad Badawi’s governance, it is now.

Mark this down - January 2006. It’s the month which has brought the greatest disappointment to those who have kept faith in Abdullah despite him being a willing partner in the old regime.

The month kicked off with the termination of two top China Press editors for wrongly claiming the Squatgate woman was a Chinese national.

The threat to suspend a newspaper could not have been made by any ministry official. It had to come from the very top - from Abdullah himself.

Clearly, someone had to pay for our humiliating apology to Beijing - the first time we had to say sorry to a foreign government for the abuse of, yes, our own citizen.

But one question still begs to be answered: Why are those who concealed the crucial information on Squatgate - that the woman was a Malaysian - not sacked?

Fast forward a week or two and we run smack into another controversy - the case of the nine non-Muslim ministers.

While it is improper protocol for the ministers to suddenly become NGO petitioners, theirs was made after the ‘green light’ from Abdullah who had publicly said he was open to amending the laws to avoid another M Moorthy imbroglio. Looks like he wasn’t after all.

There was also Abdullah’s dramatic reversal on the Islamic Family Law bill after the government made the asinine ‘pass the law first and we’ll amend it later’ pledge.

The flawed bill was indeed passed but not gazetted - probably another first in our history.

Knives out for Pak Lah?

Perhaps Abdullah has been oversold by his spin-doctors as a reformist. There is one cardinal rule in politics - you don’t promise what you cannot deliver.

This is not to say little separate between Abdullah and his former boss, Dr Mahathir Mohamad. There are differences, and significant ones too. But don’t expect the government to completely change its spots simply because it has a new man at the helm.

It is becoming clear that the forces of reaction - those aligned to the Mahathir regime - are slowly getting the upper hand in their battle for control within Umno.

As mentioned in this column before, Abdullah’s biggest mistake was not clearing out Mahathir’s sympathisers when he was at his strongest - just after the 2004 general elections when he romped home with an unprecedented majority.

It is ironic that Malaysians are already talking about the post-Abdullah regime only two years after the man was elected the most popular leader in the country’s history.

However, Abdullah is still Umno’s lethal weapon against the opposition, so don’t expect a move against him soon, that is, not until after the next general elections.

But for now, expect Abdullah’s enemies to undermine his leadership though he would still win the next election but with a less convincing margin. And that fact will be used against him when the knives are out.

Then there are the two other issues which had also cropped up this month - Mahathir’s outrage over the sale of Proton’s motorbike unit for a song and the Metramac scandal.

The first was Mahathir taking rearguard action to defend his legacy while the second was a stealth message to the old man for him to zip his motor mouth and leave the new administration alone.

End of Mahathirnomics

The fight for supremacy in Umno is really over Mahathirnomics. To Mahathirists, it’s the silver bullet to soothe our economic woes via the mantra ‘spend freely and growth will take care of itself’. Abdullahristas don’t share the faith.

Mahathirists are at a lost why the government is claiming, time and again, that it has run out of money to fund the kind of mega-projects which excite well-connected tycoons and party faithful alike.

After all, pump-priming the economy had pulled the nation out of 1997-98 financial morass. It worked then, why shouldn’t it work now?

Abdullah may know the situation better than anyone. True, we chalked a respectable five percent growth last year but much of it was fueled by the unexpected bonanza in petroleum and palm oil exports. Peek beneath the surface however, businesses are hurting, sentiments are down.

That the government is going to spend less money in the 9th Malaysia Plan compared to the previous five years is an indication of the financial crunch. This is made worse when we have to soon meet our debt repayments for Mahathir’s years of profligacy.

This factional fight will continue in the months to come. And with Abdullahristas under siege, it is not surprising that the clampdown on the media has begun, with China Press being the first to be brought to heel.

When Mahathir became PM in 1981, then, too, there was a honeymoon period where the media was relatively free to debate and report on key issues affecting the country.

Let 1,000 flowers bloom, said Mahathir. That lasted three years.

We are just moving into the third year of the Abdullah administration. Déjà vu? You bet.


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.jeffooi.com/mt32/mt-tb.cgi/50

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Déjà vu? Same old, same old.:

» Smell, when body language tells from Screenshots
Two pictures... Malaysiakini picture From TV images beamed live on Feb 14, PM Abdullah Abdullah visibly didn't look his confident self when announcing the new Cabinet line-up -- what more with his deputy standing within breathing distance as if to... [Read More]

» Hedging for the future from Screenshots
Probably ten-out-of-ten people who follow Malaysian politics closely would tell you that Abdul Razak Baginda, executive director of the Malaysian Strategic Research Centre, is a loyalist and strategist to the DPM since the time Najib Razak was the Educ... [Read More]

Comments

With all the daggers at his back, what can AB do but to walk the tight rope?

He cannot possibly rock the boat and keep it afloat.

AB not only clean up his 'rubbish' but also he has to clean up that 'previous man's' 'rubbish'. Malaysia is so full of rubbish!

The Jimmy Carter of Malaysian politics is at it again. Spineless, naive, useless, incompetent, these are the terms we can use to describe AAB. Please, UMNO, spare our agony and get rid of this guy. Any other candidate for PM is better than this guy.

Isn't that most of the UMNO leaders wanted him down? As long as he is the PM, we should support him and his efforts. Till then, we deserve a better PM.

"Its deja vu all over again". Yogi Berra.

ps. For your Phillistines, its NOT Yogi The Bear. 'k?

INTERNET does not operate in a legal vacuum.
Read this before you post a comment in this blog!

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)